88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Vredestein T Trac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
62/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
77/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein T Trac 2 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 59
Why this score
| Source | T Trac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | T Trac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | T Trac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 26 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | T Trac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | T Trac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein T Trac 2 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 64 |
| Dry | 93 | 34 |
| Wet | 84 | 84 |
| Comfort | 87 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 59 |
| Handling | 85 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/14 · 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 | 14% #7/12 · 2020 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test | +5.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein T-Trac 2 is generally regarded as a competent mid-range tire that balances comfort and durability with respectable dry-weather performance. While users appreciate its ride quality and tread longevity, some note that its wet-weather capabilities fall slightly short of top-tier premium competitors.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong dry-weather grip
- Impressive treadwear longevity
- Good value proposition for a mid-range tire
Cons
- Average wet-weather performance compared to premium brands
- Noticeable road noise on rougher surfaces
- Performance consistency may not match top-tier market leaders
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's treadwear rating (360) compares favorably against common alternatives like Bridgestone and Hankook.
- The tire is perceived as a suitable, balanced choice for daily driving rather than high-performance applications.
The Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is widely regarded as a high-comfort, stable tire specifically engineered for MPVs and SUVs with higher centers of gravity. While users consistently praise its superior wet-weather grip and noise suppression, long-term satisfaction is somewhat tempered by reports of inconsistent tread longevity and potential material degradation over time.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
- Competitive fuel efficiency
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Observations
- Users specifically noted that the tire significantly improves stability and reduces body roll in MPVs like the Toyota Vellfire.
- Drivers of SUVs, such as the Hyundai Tucson and Nissan Qashqai, reported a marked improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence compared to OEM tire options.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein T Trac 2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Vredestein
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Vredestein T Trac 2 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 93 vs 34 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 87 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 90 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 85 vs 80 on handling.
Tire A · Vredestein T Trac 2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein T Trac 2 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.