78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
55 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy XM2 vs Yokohama BluEarth 1 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth 1 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy XM2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy XM2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Energy XM2 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy XM2 | Yokohama BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 82 |
| Dry | 81 | 90 |
| Wet | 74 | 83 |
| Comfort | 72 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 83 |
| Handling | 74 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy XM2 is widely regarded as a durable, long-lasting touring tire that excels in tread life and reliability for daily commuting. While many users praise its comfort and consistent performance, opinions are polarized regarding noise levels and wet-weather grip, with some drivers finding them exceptionally quiet and others reporting significant road noise as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Strong puncture resistance
- Reliable dry and wet grip for daily driving
- High levels of ride comfort
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can feel less responsive during spirited driving
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Inconsistent performance feedback regarding wet-weather traction
Observations
- Users with smaller hatchbacks and sedans frequently report high satisfaction with comfort and fuel efficiency.
- Drivers of heavier or higher-torque vehicles occasionally noted that the soft sidewalls lead to noticeable body roll and less precise handling.
- Owners of vehicles with smaller wheel diameters (15-16 inch) often view the tire as a significant upgrade over budget stock options.
The Yokohama BluEarth-A is regarded as a highly durable tire that offers impressive longevity and reliable wet-weather performance during its early life cycle. While users appreciate its consistent wear characteristics, performance in adverse conditions and noise levels tend to degrade as the tread depth approaches its limit.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Even wear patterns across the set
- Strong wet-weather confidence when new
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread wears down
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Performance taper toward the end of the service life
Observations
- Users noted that upsizing from factory specifications (e.g., 215 to 225) did not negatively impact the tire's ability to maintain even wear over high mileage.
- The tire demonstrates high endurance, with users reporting over 50,000km of service while maintaining usable tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy XM2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Michelin
82
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth 1 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the Michelin Energy XM2 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth 1 scores 90 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth 1 scores 83 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth 1 scores 80 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy XM2 scores 86 vs 83 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Energy XM2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth 1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy XM2 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth 1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.