75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
54 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth 1 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth 1 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 73 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth 1 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 82 |
| Dry | 79 | 90 |
| Wet | 66 | 83 |
| Comfort | 89 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 83 |
| Handling | 71 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ComfortContact CC6 is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for noise reduction and ride comfort, effectively absorbing road imperfections and providing a serene cabin experience. While it excels in daily commuting and long-distance cruising, it is frequently criticized for its soft sidewalls and lackluster wet-weather performance, making it unsuitable for aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
- Reliable dry-road handling for standard commuting
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
- Lack of steering feedback and stability at higher speeds
Observations
- Users with vehicles lacking factory soundproofing, such as older compact cars, report the most significant improvements in cabin quietness.
- Drivers of taller vehicles or MPVs note that the soft sidewall leads to a lack of confidence during cornering due to increased body roll.
- Performance is highly dependent on driving style; those transitioning from performance-oriented tires often find the CC6's handling characteristics too 'mushy' or unresponsive.
The Yokohama BluEarth-A is regarded as a highly durable tire that offers impressive longevity and reliable wet-weather performance during its early life cycle. While users appreciate its consistent wear characteristics, performance in adverse conditions and noise levels tend to degrade as the tread depth approaches its limit.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Even wear patterns across the set
- Strong wet-weather confidence when new
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather grip as tread wears down
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Performance taper toward the end of the service life
Observations
- Users noted that upsizing from factory specifications (e.g., 215 to 225) did not negatively impact the tire's ability to maintain even wear over high mileage.
- The tire demonstrates high endurance, with users reporting over 50,000km of service while maintaining usable tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama BluEarth 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
82
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth 1 — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth 1 scores 83 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 89 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth 1 scores 90 vs 79 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth 1 scores 80 vs 71 on handling.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth 1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ComfortContact CC6 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth 1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.