83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
29 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
93/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 — better comfort, wet and snow. Pick the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 90 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 83 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 90% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 98 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 88% | 98% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 95 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 86% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 93 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | 62 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 93 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 88 |
| Dry | 89 | 82 |
| Wet | 86 | 93 |
| Snow | 82 | 88 |
| Comfort | 85 | 93 |
| Noise | 59 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 95 |
| Handling | 88 | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 90% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | +7.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #3/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 98% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | -0.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 99% #2/12 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 87% #9/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | +12.6 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #3/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -3.3 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 92% #9/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 100% #10/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | -7.7 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #13/51 · 2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! | 100% #1/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -92.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 86% #4/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 95% #4/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | -9.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% #8/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 98% #2/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | -0.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 96% #5/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #4/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 88% #6/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter SUV / 4x4 Tyre Test | -9.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is widely regarded as a premium, highly balanced winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions while offering exceptional comfort and low noise levels. Most users report high levels of confidence in varied winter weather, though a small minority of users report inconsistent performance in severe snow and ice, and some note that steering response is less sharp than dedicated performance-focused alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of cabin comfort and low road noise
- Strong, predictable grip on snow and slush
- Good balance of dry handling and rolling resistance
- Solid tread life and durability for a performance winter tire
Cons
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Steering feel can be perceived as 'soft' or 'jelly' compared to summer tires
- Performance can drop off in temperatures above 8-10°C
- Inconsistent feedback regarding extreme ice traction
Observations
- EV and hybrid owners frequently praise the tire for its low rolling resistance and quiet operation.
- Drivers of high-performance RWD vehicles report that while the tire provides excellent grip, it may feel less stiff and sharp during aggressive cornering compared to summer counterparts.
- Users on larger wheel diameters (20-inch) report that the tire maintains high comfort levels without sacrificing handling.
The Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 is highly regarded as a premium, long-lasting winter tire that excels in demanding snowy and icy conditions. Users consistently praise its reliability and safety across diverse vehicle types, noting that it provides a balanced performance that prioritizes winter traction without sacrificing comfort or tread longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions.
- Impressive tread life and durability over long-term usage.
- Consistent, safe performance across a wide variety of winter weather scenarios.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels on dry pavement.
Cons
- Slightly less responsive handling on dry, cold roads compared to specialized dry-weather winter tires.
- Premium pricing typical of the Michelin brand.
- Performance is optimized for winter, which may feel less sharp in mild, dry conditions.
Observations
- Proven versatility across a wide range of vehicle architectures, including 4x4 SUVs like the Range Rover Evoque and Ford Ranger, as well as 2WD passenger cars and commercial vans.
- Demonstrated capability in extreme mountainous terrain with steep inclines and tight hairpins, confirming its suitability for heavy-duty winter use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Continental
88
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 — better comfort, wet and snow. Pick the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 scores 93 vs 85 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 89 vs 82 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 scores 93 vs 86 on wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 scores 88 vs 82 on snow.
Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Alpin 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also compared with
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.