88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
33 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
93/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 and Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is stronger on noise, snow and dry. Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 is stronger on treadwear, handling and wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 98 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 95 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Blizzak DM-V2 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 62 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 95 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Latitude Alpin 2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 93 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 88 |
| Dry | 90 | 82 |
| Wet | 90 | 93 |
| Snow | 99 | 88 |
| Comfort | 90 | 93 |
| Noise | 88 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 95 |
| Handling | 80 | 93 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
88
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is widely regarded as a premier dedicated winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice. While users acknowledge that the soft rubber compound leads to faster tread wear if used in warmer temperatures, the consensus is that the safety and handling benefits in harsh winter conditions far outweigh these longevity concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Significant improvement over all-season tires for winter handling
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Observations
- Users report excellent performance across a variety of vehicle types, including heavy SUVs like the BMW X5 and VW Touareg, as well as light trucks like the Ford F-150.
- Owners of hybrid vehicles noted that the tire's soft compound may wear more quickly under the specific torque characteristics of their vehicles.
- Some users successfully utilize oversized tire diameters for increased ground clearance in deep snow without sacrificing ride quality.
The Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 is highly regarded as a premium, long-lasting winter tire that excels in demanding snowy and icy conditions. Users consistently praise its reliability and safety across diverse vehicle types, noting that it provides a balanced performance that prioritizes winter traction without sacrificing comfort or tread longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in deep snow, slush, and icy conditions.
- Impressive tread life and durability over long-term usage.
- Consistent, safe performance across a wide variety of winter weather scenarios.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels on dry pavement.
Cons
- Slightly less responsive handling on dry, cold roads compared to specialized dry-weather winter tires.
- Premium pricing typical of the Michelin brand.
- Performance is optimized for winter, which may feel less sharp in mild, dry conditions.
Observations
- Proven versatility across a wide range of vehicle architectures, including 4x4 SUVs like the Range Rover Evoque and Ford Ranger, as well as 2WD passenger cars and commercial vans.
- Demonstrated capability in extreme mountainous terrain with steep inclines and tight hairpins, confirming its suitability for heavy-duty winter use.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 48 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
88
/ 100
Bridgestone
88
/ 100
Michelin
Too close to call: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 and Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is stronger on noise, snow and dry. Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 is stronger on treadwear, handling and wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 88 vs 62 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 scores 95 vs 82 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 scores 93 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 99 vs 88 on snow.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Alpin 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 also compared with
Michelin Latitude Alpin 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.