Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Michelin LTX A/S vs Yokohama Advan A032R — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Michelin LTX A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
62/100
Owner ratings
Dry
81
Wet
73
Snow
55
Comfort
83
Noise
83
Treadwear
77
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan A032R

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Yokohama Advan A032R tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
76/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
100
Wet
70
Snow
–
Comfort
50
Noise
–
Treadwear
40
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin LTX A/S — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan A032R if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A032R leads by 19
A — Michelin LTX A/S
81
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
100
Why this score
SourceLTX A/SAdvan A032R
Tyre Reviews owners – 100

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) LTX A/S leads by 3
A — Michelin LTX A/S
73
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
70
Why this score
SourceLTX A/SAdvan A032R
Tyre Reviews owners – 70

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin LTX A/S
55
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) LTX A/S leads by 33
A — Michelin LTX A/S
83
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
50
Why this score
SourceLTX A/SAdvan A032R
Tyre Reviews owners – 50

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin LTX A/S
83
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) LTX A/S leads by 37
A — Michelin LTX A/S
77
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
40
Why this score
SourceLTX A/SAdvan A032R
Tyre Reviews owners – 40

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A032R leads by 5
A — Michelin LTX A/S
80
B — Yokohama Advan A032R
85
Why this score
SourceLTX A/SAdvan A032R
Tyre Reviews owners – 85

Scores at a glance

Michelin LTX A/S vs Yokohama Advan A032R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin LTX A/SYokohama Advan A032R
Relative Score 78 66
Dry 81 100
Wet 73 70
Snow 55 –
Comfort 83 50
Noise 83 –
Treadwear 77 40
Handling 80 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin LTX A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama Advan A032R

The Yokohama Advan A032R is a highly capable semi-slick tire that excels in dry track conditions, offering predictable handling and impressive lateral and longitudinal grip. While it performs reliably within its optimal temperature window, users should be prepared for rapid tread wear and a performance drop-off if the tire exceeds its thermal operating range.

Pros

  • Rapid warm-up time to reach optimal operating temperature
  • Predictable and progressive grip characteristics
  • Excellent traction during hard braking and cornering
  • Surprisingly manageable performance in damp conditions for a semi-slick

Cons

  • Short tread life, particularly under intensive track use
  • Performance degradation when exceeding optimal thermal limits
  • Limited longevity compared to street-oriented tires

Observations

  • The tire is best suited for short-to-medium track sessions of 15 to 25 minutes to maintain peak performance.
  • Users report that the tire remains effective for approximately 500 to 800 kilometers of track use before significant wear occurs.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin LTX A/S B · Yokohama Advan A032R
Category—Summer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Yokohama

Winner: Michelin LTX A/S — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan A032R if dry and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin LTX A/S scores 77 vs 40 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin LTX A/S scores 83 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan A032R scores 100 vs 81 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan A032R scores 85 vs 80 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin LTX A/S
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A032R

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.