80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Michelin LTX A/T 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Michelin
Michelin LTX A/T 2
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin LTX A/T 2 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
LTX A/T 2 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
LTX A/T 2 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 88 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Dueler H/T 689 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
LTX A/T 2 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 88 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Dueler H/T 689 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 92 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
LTX A/T 2 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | Michelin LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 89 |
| Dry | 82 | 92 |
| Wet | 72 | 87 |
| Snow | 90 | 84 |
| Comfort | 71 | 87 |
| Treadwear | 93 | 91 |
| Handling | 70 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 presents a mixed performance profile, characterized by excellent tread longevity and reliable wet-weather grip on paved surfaces. However, users report significant shortcomings in ride comfort and off-road capability, specifically noting issues with road noise and handling stability on loose terrain.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong grip and traction in wet road conditions
- Reliable performance for standard on-road commuting
Cons
- Poor handling and traction on gravel or loose surfaces
- Noticeable road noise during highway travel
- Excessive bounciness affecting ride quality
Observations
- Users operating 4x4 vehicles primarily on-road report satisfaction with wet-weather performance.
- The tire is perceived as unsuitable for drivers seeking off-road capability despite the vehicle's 4x4 classification.
The Michelin LTX A/T2 is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting tire that excels in durability and consistent performance for heavy-duty trucks and vans. While it commands a higher price point, users consistently praise its exceptional tread life and reliable handling in both wet and dry conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and overall durability
- Reliable wet and dry road traction
- Improved steering response and ride comfort compared to competitors
- High resistance to punctures and structural integrity over time
Cons
- Premium price point
- Performance in deep snow and ice is considered adequate but not class-leading
- Rubber compounds may become slippery or lose traction as the tire reaches advanced age
Observations
- Heavy-duty truck owners (F-250, Ram 3500) report high satisfaction with towing stability and ride comfort.
- Van owners report extreme mileage capabilities, with some users achieving up to 90,000 miles when paired with strict maintenance schedules.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | B · Michelin LTX A/T 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Bridgestone
89
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin LTX A/T 2 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin LTX A/T 2 scores 95 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin LTX A/T 2 scores 87 vs 71 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin LTX A/T 2 scores 87 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin LTX A/T 2 scores 92 vs 82 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
Tire B · Michelin LTX A/T 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 also compared with
Michelin LTX A/T 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.