Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689

Summer Premium Touring tires

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
72
Snow
90
Comfort
71
Noise
–
Treadwear
93
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Kumho Road Venture AT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
90
Snow
88
Comfort
92
Noise
92
Treadwear
91
Handling
91

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture AT51 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture AT51 leads by 13
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
82
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
95
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 80 83
SimpleTire owners – 96

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture AT51 leads by 18
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
72
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
90
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 70 73
SimpleTire owners – 93

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Dueler H/T 689 leads by 2
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
90
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
88
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
Tire Rack owners – 87
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners – 90

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture AT51 leads by 21
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
71
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
92
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
Tire Rack owners – 79
Tyre Reviews owners 70 80
SimpleTire owners – 92

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
–
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
92
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
SimpleTire owners – 85

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Dueler H/T 689 leads by 2
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
93
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
91
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
Tire Rack owners – 80
Tyre Reviews owners 95 70
SimpleTire owners – 86

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture AT51 leads by 21
A — Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
70
B — Kumho Road Venture AT51
91
Why this score
SourceDueler H/T 689Road Venture AT51
Tyre Reviews owners 70 73

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Dueler H/T 689Kumho Road Venture AT51
Relative Score 80 91
Dry 82 95
Wet 72 90
Snow 90 88
Comfort 71 92
Noise – 92
Treadwear 93 91
Handling 70 91

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689

The Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 presents a mixed performance profile, characterized by excellent tread longevity and reliable wet-weather grip on paved surfaces. However, users report significant shortcomings in ride comfort and off-road capability, specifically noting issues with road noise and handling stability on loose terrain.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Strong grip and traction in wet road conditions
  • Reliable performance for standard on-road commuting

Cons

  • Poor handling and traction on gravel or loose surfaces
  • Noticeable road noise during highway travel
  • Excessive bounciness affecting ride quality

Observations

  • Users operating 4x4 vehicles primarily on-road report satisfaction with wet-weather performance.
  • The tire is perceived as unsuitable for drivers seeking off-road capability despite the vehicle's 4x4 classification.
Tire B Kumho Road Venture AT51

The Kumho Road Venture A/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that excels in noise reduction and comfort compared to more aggressive competitors. While most users praise its performance in snow, rain, and gravel, a minority of owners report issues with uneven wear, balancing difficulties, and durability concerns.

Pros

  • Exceptional noise levels for an all-terrain tire
  • Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
  • Reliable traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions
  • Comfortable ride quality on various road surfaces

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and cupping
  • Occasional balancing issues causing vibrations
  • Some concerns regarding puncture resistance
  • Inconsistent performance in deep mud

Observations

  • Users transitioning from more aggressive tires (like the BFG KO2) on Jeeps and trucks frequently report a significant improvement in cabin quietness.
  • Heavy-duty truck owners occasionally report ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, which may be sensitive to specific PSI adjustments.
  • The tire is noted for maintaining good performance characteristics on both older SUVs and modern electric vehicles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 B · Kumho Road Venture AT51
CategorySummer Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available—9
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth—13.5/32″
UTQG—540 A A
Treadwear warranty—55,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—65 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Kumho

Winner: Kumho Road Venture AT51 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 92 vs 71 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 91 vs 70 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 90 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 95 vs 82 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture AT51

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.