Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Kumho Road Venture AT51
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 96 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 85 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Dueler H/T 689 | Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | Kumho Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 91 |
| Dry | 82 | 95 |
| Wet | 72 | 90 |
| Snow | 90 | 88 |
| Comfort | 71 | 92 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 93 | 91 |
| Handling | 70 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 presents a mixed performance profile, characterized by excellent tread longevity and reliable wet-weather grip on paved surfaces. However, users report significant shortcomings in ride comfort and off-road capability, specifically noting issues with road noise and handling stability on loose terrain.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong grip and traction in wet road conditions
- Reliable performance for standard on-road commuting
Cons
- Poor handling and traction on gravel or loose surfaces
- Noticeable road noise during highway travel
- Excessive bounciness affecting ride quality
Observations
- Users operating 4x4 vehicles primarily on-road report satisfaction with wet-weather performance.
- The tire is perceived as unsuitable for drivers seeking off-road capability despite the vehicle's 4x4 classification.
The Kumho Road Venture A/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that excels in noise reduction and comfort compared to more aggressive competitors. While most users praise its performance in snow, rain, and gravel, a minority of owners report issues with uneven wear, balancing difficulties, and durability concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional noise levels for an all-terrain tire
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
- Reliable traction in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Comfortable ride quality on various road surfaces
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and cupping
- Occasional balancing issues causing vibrations
- Some concerns regarding puncture resistance
- Inconsistent performance in deep mud
Observations
- Users transitioning from more aggressive tires (like the BFG KO2) on Jeeps and trucks frequently report a significant improvement in cabin quietness.
- Heavy-duty truck owners occasionally report ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, which may be sensitive to specific PSI adjustments.
- The tire is noted for maintaining good performance characteristics on both older SUVs and modern electric vehicles.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Dueler H/T 689 | B · Kumho Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | — | 9 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 13.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 540 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 65 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture AT51 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 92 vs 71 on comfort.
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 91 vs 70 on handling.
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 90 vs 72 on wet.
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 95 vs 82 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.