64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 vs Riken All Star 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
56
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Pilot HX MXM4 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 73 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Pilot HX MXM4 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 57 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Pilot HX MXM4 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Pilot HX MXM4 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 37 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot HX MXM4 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Pilot HX MXM4 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 | Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 56 |
| Dry | 77 | 73 |
| Wet | 59 | 57 |
| Comfort | 77 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 37 |
| Handling | 62 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Tire A
56
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 receives a polarized reception, often serving as a polarizing OEM fitment that struggles to meet the high performance expectations associated with the Michelin brand. While some users appreciate their initial comfort and longevity, a significant portion of the user base reports concerning performance deficiencies in wet and winter conditions, alongside reports of premature sidewall degradation.
Pros
- Acceptable tread life for some users under specific driving conditions
- Generally comfortable ride quality when new
- Reliable performance for moderate, dry-weather driving
Cons
- Poor traction and safety concerns on wet surfaces
- Inadequate performance in winter conditions despite M+S rating
- Reports of sidewall tearing and tread delamination
- High price point relative to perceived performance
Observations
- Users driving performance-oriented vehicles like the Civic Si and BMW Z3 report that the tire's handling characteristics are insufficient for their vehicle's capabilities.
- Owners of AWD vehicles noted that the tire failed to provide expected confidence in adverse weather, contradicting the benefits of their drivetrain.
The Riken All Star 2 is viewed as a polarizing budget-tier tire that serves as a temporary solution rather than a long-term investment. While some users appreciate its value proposition for light-duty city driving, others report significant concerns regarding premature wear and overall durability compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Attractive low price point
- Acceptable noise levels for budget-conscious drivers
- Adequate stopping performance in light city conditions
Cons
- Poor tread longevity and durability
- Failure to meet safety inspection standards within a year
- Inconsistent quality compared to premium tire brands
Observations
- Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daewoo Matiz reported acceptable noise levels and curb-climbing capability.
- The tire is frequently criticized when used as a direct replacement for higher-end performance tires, highlighting a significant gap in material longevity.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 | B · Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Michelin
56
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 — better treadwear, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 scores 54 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 scores 77 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 scores 77 vs 73 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot HX MXM4
Tire B · Riken All Star 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot HX MXM4 also compared with
Riken All Star 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.