84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
59 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Latitude Cross vs Riken All Star 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
56
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Latitude Cross — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 73 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 57 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 52
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 37 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Latitude Cross leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Cross | Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 56 |
| Dry | 86 | 73 |
| Wet | 84 | 57 |
| Snow | 74 | – |
| Comfort | 82 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 37 |
| Handling | 76 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
56
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Latitude Cross is widely regarded as a high-performing, versatile all-terrain tire that excels as a 'best-of-both-worlds' compromise for SUV and 4x4 owners. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather grip, impressive longevity, and off-road capability, noting it significantly outperforms standard factory-fitted tires in mixed-terrain conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and resistance to aquaplaning
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong off-road performance on mud, gravel, and grass
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on-road manners for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp rocks and punctures
- Increased fuel consumption compared to road-biased tires
- Performance degradation and hardening of the rubber compound over long-term aging (5+ years)
- Occasional reports of increased road noise at high motorway speeds
Observations
- Heavy 4x4 and SUV owners (e.g., Land Cruiser, Defender) report excellent load-carrying stability and longevity.
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted Bridgestone Duelers consistently report a 'night and day' improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence.
- Small 4x4 owners (e.g., Suzuki Jimny, Panda Cross) note improved off-road capability without sacrificing daily driving comfort.
The Riken All Star 2 is viewed as a polarizing budget-tier tire that serves as a temporary solution rather than a long-term investment. While some users appreciate its value proposition for light-duty city driving, others report significant concerns regarding premature wear and overall durability compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Attractive low price point
- Acceptable noise levels for budget-conscious drivers
- Adequate stopping performance in light city conditions
Cons
- Poor tread longevity and durability
- Failure to meet safety inspection standards within a year
- Inconsistent quality compared to premium tire brands
Observations
- Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daewoo Matiz reported acceptable noise levels and curb-climbing capability.
- The tire is frequently criticized when used as a direct replacement for higher-end performance tires, highlighting a significant gap in material longevity.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Cross | B · Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Michelin
56
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Michelin Latitude Cross — better treadwear, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 89 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 84 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 76 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 82 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Latitude Cross
Tire B · Riken All Star 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Latitude Cross also compared with
Riken All Star 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.