Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Michelin Latitude Cross vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 84 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 80 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 59 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 90 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 76 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 28 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 79 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Latitude Cross | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 76 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Latitude Cross | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 82 |
| Dry | 86 | 88 |
| Wet | 84 | 82 |
| Snow | 74 | 69 |
| Comfort | 82 | 95 |
| Noise | – | 47 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 83 |
| Handling | 76 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Latitude Cross is widely regarded as a high-performing, versatile all-terrain tire that excels as a 'best-of-both-worlds' compromise for SUV and 4x4 owners. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather grip, impressive longevity, and off-road capability, noting it significantly outperforms standard factory-fitted tires in mixed-terrain conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and resistance to aquaplaning
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong off-road performance on mud, gravel, and grass
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable on-road manners for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to sharp rocks and punctures
- Increased fuel consumption compared to road-biased tires
- Performance degradation and hardening of the rubber compound over long-term aging (5+ years)
- Occasional reports of increased road noise at high motorway speeds
Observations
- Heavy 4x4 and SUV owners (e.g., Land Cruiser, Defender) report excellent load-carrying stability and longevity.
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted Bridgestone Duelers consistently report a 'night and day' improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence.
- Small 4x4 owners (e.g., Suzuki Jimny, Panda Cross) note improved off-road capability without sacrificing daily driving comfort.
The Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is widely regarded as a highly capable, road-oriented all-terrain tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with moderate off-road utility. While most users praise its longevity, wet-weather performance, and snow traction, a segment of owners reports inconsistent tread life and occasional traction issues in specific conditions like deep mud or ice.
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and relatively low noise levels for an all-terrain tire
- Strong performance in light-to-moderate off-road conditions, including gravel and dirt
- Impressive tread longevity for many users, with several reports exceeding 40,000 miles
- Reliable wet-weather handling and 3PMSF (Three-Peak Mountain Snowflake) winter certification
- Aesthetic appeal with an aggressive tread pattern
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier trucks
- Performance limitations in deep mud and heavy, rutted terrain
- Occasional reports of 'floaty' steering or lack of stability on certain vehicle platforms
- Mixed feedback regarding wet-weather traction, with some users noting slippage under acceleration
Observations
- Users of heavy-duty trucks (3/4 ton and 1-ton) report varying experiences, with some praising the load-carrying stability while others note faster tread wear under heavy towing.
- Subaru owners and light SUV drivers frequently highlight the tire's ability to maintain a quiet, car-like ride compared to more aggressive mud-terrain alternatives.
- Drivers switching from passenger-rated tires to LT (Light Truck) load-range E versions noted a significant increase in ride harshness and steering stiffness.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Michelin Latitude Cross
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community members generally praise the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 as a comfortable, quiet, and capable all-terrain tire that excels for daily highway commuting while handling light off-road and winter conditions well. It is frequently recommended for drivers prioritizing on-road manners, fuel efficiency, and mild trail or snow capability over heavy rock crawling.
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
“GEOLANDAR A/T G015 Anyone running these on 17" rims, stock or other? I have Enkei M52 rims, 17x7.5 and 45mm offset. What size fits without rubbing? 215/60R17 looks to be the closest, the only other size close is 225/65R17 which I think will be too big without a lift. I am open to other suggestions for off-road capable tires that will mainly be used on-road. K02 is out because they don't fit without rubbing, and I plan to add flaps at some point and do not want to lift the vehicle or get different rims.”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Anyone here running Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 G018's? Any complaints or regrets (road noise, balancing issues, etc.), specifically in SL load? Currently have the Geolandar A/T G015's on my 4th gen and am considering the A/T4's next. All the real feedback (non-commercial reviews) I've been able find on here and other forums seem to be pretty old and mostly by people without a ton of miles on them. My use case is about 90% on road with the remaining 10% on mild to moderate trails. Not a rock crawler and never will be. The G015's in SL load have been pretty perfect but I've been thinking about changing to the A/T4's next for slightly better off road performance. Main concern (aside from weight, which is why I'm looking to stay with SL instead of C) is wet pavement safety since I drive my young kids pretty much daily. I only have a roof rack, so not too much added weight.”
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Latitude Cross | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | — | 41 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin
Yokohama
Too close to call: Michelin Latitude Cross and Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 are within 2 points overall. Michelin Latitude Cross is stronger on treadwear and snow. Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is stronger on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 95 vs 82 on comfort.
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 89 vs 83 on treadwear.
Michelin Latitude Cross scores 74 vs 69 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.