84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
9 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
1,959 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs Nexen N FERA RU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
75/100
25 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N FERA RU1 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 90 | 81 |
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 82 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 95% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 95 | 82 |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 75 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 90% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N FERA RU1 leads by 38
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 1 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 76 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 74 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport 4 SUV leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 71 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 77 |
| Dry | 93 | 82 |
| Wet | 94 | 79 |
| Comfort | 38 | 76 |
| Noise | 82 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 78 |
| Handling | 96 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #2/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +1.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +11.9 | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 71% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 91% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -20 | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Gravel | 97% #9/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +0.2 | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Gravel | 95% #2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 97% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Mud | 94% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 88% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +5.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #8/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +1.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #10/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 64% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +36.4 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 13% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +87.5 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +5.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +10.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is widely regarded as a premium, high-performance tire that significantly improves ride quality and handling dynamics, particularly when replacing harsh OEM run-flat tires. While users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather grip and confident dry-road handling, the consensus is tempered by reports of rapid tread wear and elevated road noise in certain applications.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance.
- Significant improvement in ride comfort and steering feel compared to OEM run-flats.
- Predictable and progressive handling at the limit.
- Strong dry-road grip and braking performance.
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, particularly on heavy or high-torque vehicles.
- Increased road noise reported by some users, especially as the tire wears.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Noticeable reduction in fuel economy or EV range due to rolling resistance.
Observations
- EV owners (notably Tesla Model Y/3) report a measurable decrease in range (approx. 10-20%) compared to OEM efficiency-focused tires.
- Users transitioning from factory-fitted run-flat tires on luxury SUVs (BMW X3, Mercedes GLC) report the most significant satisfaction regarding ride compliance and noise reduction.
- Heavy, high-torque SUVs and performance vehicles experience accelerated tread wear, with some users reporting significant degradation under 20,000 miles.
The Nexen N Fera RU1 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction, often outperforming more expensive premium brands in these categories. While many users report excellent longevity and wet/dry grip, a subset of owners experiences inconsistent performance, particularly regarding tread wear and high-speed stability on specific vehicle platforms.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Impressive tread life for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some reports of premature chipping or rapid degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback or vibrations at highway speeds
- Performance drop-off in colder temperatures or wet conditions for some users
- Lack of responsiveness during aggressive or high-speed maneuvers
Observations
- SUV owners (e.g., Volvo XC90, VW Tiguan) generally praise the comfort and longevity, though some report concerns with emergency handling.
- Users on larger rim sizes (e.g., 20-inch) have reported specific issues with sidewall flex and vibration that were not present on smaller, higher-profile sizes.
- Performance on modern EVs (e.g., Kia EV6) appears polarized, with some users finding the handling characteristics unsuitable for the vehicle's dynamics.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is widely regarded as a high-performance tire option for luxury and sport utility vehicles, often compared against alternatives like Pirelli Scorpions and Michelin's own Latitude series. Users appreciate its strong grip and dynamic capabilities, though questions regarding tread wear, run-flat options, and comparisons with all-season variants are common.
r/CX5
·103 upvotes ·2021-05-15
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
r/PorscheMacan
·1 upvote ·2026-04-04
“I'm leaning towards the Pilot Sport 4 SUV over the LS3. I'd really like to see how much better these tires grip. Although it sounds like I'll be sacrificing a little comfort, but with air suspension I'm not too worried.”
r/Audi
·1 upvote ·2026-07-09
“Nope nope nope. I live in the SE and my RWD sports car get squirrelly with normal driving when it drops below 40 on my PS4Ss. You’d be in a ditch first bit of snow.”
r/Howsmytire
·1 upvote ·2026-07-15
“Used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV I am looking to buy these used Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires. They have 7+ mm thread left, DOT 0923. I am wondering why the two tires on the right are so rough / full of small holes, while the ones on the left are so smooth. Probably the right ones were on the front, but still what could this condition be indicating? I still haven't been to the shop to see them and feel how is the rubber, wanted to hear an advice first.”
Top themes
#handling and grip#tread life and wear#comparison with other tires#luxury SUV fitment#seasonal performance
Based on 9 community posts
Tire B
Nexen N FERA RU1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | B · Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Michelin
77
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better handling, wet and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N FERA RU1 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 76 vs 38 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 96 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 94 vs 79 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 90 vs 78 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Tire B · Nexen N FERA RU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV also compared with
Nexen N FERA RU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.