65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Avon Turbospeed CR27 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
84/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
1,988 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Turbospeed CR27 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 100 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Turbospeed CR27 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 45 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 44
Why this score
| Source | Turbospeed CR27 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 95 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Turbospeed CR27 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Turbospeed CR27 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Turbospeed CR27 | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 90 |
| Dry | 70 | 94 |
| Wet | 60 | 83 |
| Comfort | 50 | 94 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 90 |
| Handling | 60 | 96 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
90
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon Turbospeed CR27 is primarily recognized as a legacy tire choice for classic luxury vehicles, specifically the Bentley Turbo R. User feedback highlights concerns regarding the longevity of the rubber compound over extended periods and the significant financial investment required for replacement.
Pros
- Period-correct aesthetic for classic luxury vehicles
- Original equipment specification for specific vintage models
Cons
- High cost of replacement
- Susceptibility to sidewall cracking and aging over long durations
- Limited modern performance benchmarks
Observations
- Specifically utilized as original equipment for the 1998 Bentley Turbo R in the 255/65R15 size.
- Users note that the tire's lifespan is often dictated more by chronological age and material degradation than by actual mileage.
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is a specialized, track-focused tire that offers exceptional dry-weather grip and steering precision for high-performance vehicles. While it excels in competitive driving and track-day environments, users emphasize that it is not suitable for daily driving, particularly due to its rapid tread wear, poor wet-weather performance, and lack of cold-temperature capability.
Pros
- Unrivaled dry-weather traction and cornering grip
- Precise steering response and communicative feedback
- Excellent performance consistency during track sessions
- Superior stability at high speeds
Cons
- Extremely short tread life and rapid wear
- Significant safety risks in wet or cold conditions
- High purchase price and high cost-per-mile
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality
Observations
- Performance is highly dependent on vehicle-specific alignment settings; improper camber can lead to premature shoulder wear.
- Users note that the tire requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperatures, making it feel 'sketchy' or stiff during short street trips.
- The tire is frequently cited as a 'one-trick pony' for track-day enthusiasts, with many users recommending the Pilot Sport 4S as a more practical alternative for street-driven vehicles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Turbospeed CR27 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Avon
90
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 94 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 96 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 94 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 83 vs 60 on wet.
Tire A · Avon Turbospeed CR27
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon Turbospeed CR27 also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.