Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Nexen N Fera AU5 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
8 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
2,005 owner reviews
Dry
86
Wet
83
Snow
–
Comfort
67
Noise
70
Treadwear
90
Handling
96

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera AU5

Summer Premium Touring tires

Nexen N Fera AU5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
21 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
78
Snow
76
Comfort
88
Noise
91
Treadwear
81
Handling
70

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera AU5 if comfort and noise matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 3
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
86
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
83
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport Cup 2N Fera AU5
Professional tests (TWG score) 78 –
Tire Rack owners 94 –
Tyre Reviews owners 94 62

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 5
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
83
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
78
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport Cup 2N Fera AU5
Professional tests (TWG score) 77 –
Tire Rack owners 55 –
Tyre Reviews owners 60 52

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
–
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
76

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera AU5 leads by 21
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
67
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
88
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport Cup 2N Fera AU5
Professional tests (TWG score) 50 –
Tire Rack owners 76 –
Tyre Reviews owners 74 80

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera AU5 leads by 21
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
70
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
91
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport Cup 2N Fera AU5
Professional tests (TWG score) 56 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 9
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
90
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
81
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport Cup 2N Fera AU5
Tire Rack owners 65 –
Tyre Reviews owners 59 67

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 26
A — Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
96
B — Nexen N Fera AU5
70
Why this score
SourcePilot Sport Cup 2N Fera AU5
Tyre Reviews owners 93 70

Scores at a glance

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Nexen N Fera AU5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2Nexen N Fera AU5
Relative Score 83 81
Dry 86 83
Wet 83 78
Snow – 76
Comfort 67 88
Noise 70 91
Treadwear 90 81
Handling 96 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2

The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 is widely regarded as a premier track-focused tire that offers exceptional dry-weather grip and steering precision for high-performance vehicles. While it provides surprising levels of feedback and stability for a semi-slick, users emphasize that it is not a traditional daily driver tire, as it requires significant heat to reach optimal performance and suffers from rapid tread wear and compromised wet-weather safety.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry-weather traction and cornering grip
  • High levels of steering feedback and communicative handling
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit
  • Strong, stiff sidewalls that enhance stability during spirited driving
  • Surprisingly capable on track for a street-legal tire

Cons

  • Very short tread life and rapid wear
  • Poor performance in cold temperatures and standing water
  • Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating grip
  • High price point relative to longevity
  • Tendency to pick up and throw road debris due to sticky compound

Observations

  • Users with high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive sports cars (e.g., Corvette, M2, GT3) report the most significant benefits in traction, though they also experience the fastest wear.
  • Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda MX-5) note that the tire's stiff sidewall significantly improves steering precision compared to standard performance tires.
  • Some users on AWD platforms noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on proper tire pressure management to avoid overheating during track sessions.
Tire B Nexen N Fera AU5

The Nexen N Fera AU5 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range tire that excels in daily commuting and highway driving. While users frequently praise its comfort, quiet ride, and wet-weather performance, its performance in winter conditions and its softer sidewall construction remain points of contention among more spirited drivers.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Strong wet-weather traction and handling
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Impressive tread longevity for daily driving

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and freezing temperatures
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced cornering precision
  • Reports of inconsistent quality control or premature structural failure
  • Tendency to flat-spot in cold weather until warmed up

Observations

  • Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles noted that the softer sidewalls and wet-weather grip can struggle with traction during low-speed acceleration.
  • Users transitioning from performance-oriented tires (like the Pirelli PZero or Dunlop SportMaxx) noted a significant increase in comfort and noise reduction, albeit with a slight sacrifice in steering feedback.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 B · Nexen N Fera AU5
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Nexen

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Nexen N Fera AU5 if comfort and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 96 vs 70 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera AU5 scores 88 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen N Fera AU5 scores 91 vs 70 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 90 vs 81 on treadwear.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Tire B · Nexen N Fera AU5

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.