85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
8 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
2,005 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Yokohama Advan S4 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
57
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 60 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 53
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 55 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 30 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 50 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 56 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 65 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 85 | 57 |
| Dry | 86 | 60 |
| Wet | 83 | 30 |
| Comfort | 67 | 50 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 90 | 85 |
| Handling | 96 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
85
/ 100
Tire A
57
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 is widely regarded as a premier track-focused tire that offers exceptional dry-weather grip and steering precision for high-performance vehicles. While it provides surprising levels of feedback and stability for a semi-slick, users emphasize that it is not a traditional daily driver tire, as it requires significant heat to reach optimal performance and suffers from rapid tread wear and compromised wet-weather safety.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather traction and cornering grip
- High levels of steering feedback and communicative handling
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics at the limit
- Strong, stiff sidewalls that enhance stability during spirited driving
- Surprisingly capable on track for a street-legal tire
Cons
- Very short tread life and rapid wear
- Poor performance in cold temperatures and standing water
- Requires significant heat to reach optimal operating grip
- High price point relative to longevity
- Tendency to pick up and throw road debris due to sticky compound
Observations
- Users with high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive sports cars (e.g., Corvette, M2, GT3) report the most significant benefits in traction, though they also experience the fastest wear.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda MX-5) note that the tire's stiff sidewall significantly improves steering precision compared to standard performance tires.
- Some users on AWD platforms noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on proper tire pressure management to avoid overheating during track sessions.
The Yokohama Advan S4 is widely regarded by users as a disappointing all-season tire that fails to deliver adequate performance in both dry and wet conditions. Owners frequently report significant issues with handling, specifically noting poor traction and a lack of confidence in inclement weather, including snow.
Pros
- Acceptable handling characteristics at very low city speeds
- Responsiveness can be marginally improved by adjusting tire pressure
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Significant lack of performance in snow and winter environments
- Noticeable understeer and sluggish turn-in response
- Harsh ride quality when tire pressures are increased to compensate for handling issues
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's handling deficiencies, particularly understeer, often necessitate vehicle suspension modifications like a stiffer rear sway bar.
- Increasing tire pressure to 38psi front and 34psi rear improves turn-in response but negatively impacts ride comfort over road imperfections.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 | B · Yokohama Advan S4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
85
/ 100
Michelin
57
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 83 vs 30 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 96 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 86 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 67 vs 50 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Tire B · Yokohama Advan S4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 also compared with
Yokohama Advan S4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.