78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
82/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Power Cup Evo vs Michelin Power GP — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Power GP — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Power GP leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Power Cup Evo | Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 98 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Power GP leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Power Cup Evo | Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 77 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Power GP leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Power Cup Evo | Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 93 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Power GP leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Power Cup Evo | Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Power GP leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Power Cup Evo | Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 95 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Power Cup Evo | Michelin Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 87 |
| Dry | 94 | 98 |
| Wet | 70 | 77 |
| Comfort | 85 | 93 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 83 |
| Handling | 85 | 95 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Power Cup Evo is regarded as a highly capable, performance-oriented tire that excels in grip and handling dynamics. Users report that it performs exceptionally well in spirited riding and driving scenarios, often drawing favorable comparisons to dedicated slick tires and other premium performance rubber.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
- Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups
- Reliable longevity for specialized applications like supermoto
Cons
- Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
- Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
- Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
Observations
- Users report excellent synergy between the tire and high-performance chassis platforms like the BMW E46 M3.
- The tire demonstrates high-level performance in niche applications, specifically noted for its 'glue-like' handling on supermoto motorcycles.
The Michelin Power GP is widely regarded as a premier hybrid tire, excelling in both spirited street riding and occasional track use. Users consistently praise its rapid warm-up time, exceptional dry grip, and surprising confidence in damp conditions, positioning it as a significant performance upgrade over its predecessors.
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time providing immediate confidence
- Exceptional dry grip and predictable feedback
- Superior performance in damp or wet conditions compared to competitors
- High agility and ease of turn-in
Cons
- Limited tread life, with some users reporting replacement intervals between 5,000 and 6,000 kilometers
- Potential for uneven wear or cupping on the tire edges
- High performance focus may not suit riders prioritizing maximum longevity
Observations
- Users transitioning from the Michelin Power RS to the Power GP on Yamaha MT-09 platforms report a noticeable step up in handling and stability.
- The tire is frequently compared favorably against dedicated track-focused rubber like the Bridgestone RS10 and Dunlop Sportsmart TT.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Power Cup Evo | B · Michelin Power GP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Michelin
87
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Power GP — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Power GP scores 83 vs 70 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Power GP scores 95 vs 85 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Power GP scores 93 vs 85 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Power GP scores 77 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Power Cup Evo
Tire B · Michelin Power GP
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Power Cup Evo also compared with
Michelin Power GP also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.