Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Michelin Primacy 4 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin Primacy 4

Summer Premium Touring tires

Michelin Primacy 4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
90/100
23 professional tests
User signal (40%)
79/100
185 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
83
Comfort
77
Noise
75
Treadwear
82
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
87/100
19 professional tests
User signal (40%)
70/100
17 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
79
Comfort
82
Noise
57
Treadwear
58
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Primacy 4 leads by 9
A — Michelin Primacy 4
87
B — Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
78
Why this score
SourcePrimacy 4N Fera Sport SU2
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 77
Tyre Reviews owners 85 81
Dry Braking (% of best) 97% 92%
Dry Handling (% of best) 100% 97%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Primacy 4 leads by 4
A — Michelin Primacy 4
83
B — Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
79
Why this score
SourcePrimacy 4N Fera Sport SU2
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 80
Tyre Reviews owners 81 77
Wet Braking (% of best) 94% 92%
Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) 93% 70%
Wet Circle (% of best) 94% 99%
Wet Handling (% of best) 95% 96%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera Sport SU2 leads by 5
A — Michelin Primacy 4
77
B — Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
82
Why this score
SourcePrimacy 4N Fera Sport SU2
Professional tests (TWG score) 74 93
Tyre Reviews owners 83 67

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Primacy 4 leads by 18
A — Michelin Primacy 4
75
B — Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
57
Why this score
SourcePrimacy 4N Fera Sport SU2
Professional tests (TWG score) 75 57

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Primacy 4 leads by 24
A — Michelin Primacy 4
82
B — Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
58
Why this score
SourcePrimacy 4N Fera Sport SU2
Tyre Reviews owners 82 58

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Primacy 4 leads by 1
A — Michelin Primacy 4
77
B — Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
76
Why this score
SourcePrimacy 4N Fera Sport SU2
Tyre Reviews owners 77 76
DriverReviews owners 86 –

Scores at a glance

Michelin Primacy 4 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Primacy 4Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Relative Score 81 71
Dry 87 78
Wet 83 79
Comfort 77 82
Noise 75 57
Treadwear 82 58
Handling 77 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 99% #2/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested 85% #16/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test +14 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 97% #5/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 92% #6/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test +5.4 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #7/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test 97% #11/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test +2.8 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 84% #4/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test 82% #7/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test +2 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 98% #33/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 97% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +1.8 Different tests
Abrasion Other 43% #4/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 76% #8/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -33.8 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test 99% #2/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test -0.2 Different tests
Price Other 94% #11/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres 62% #2/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test +32.1 Different tests
Value Other 52% #16/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 67% #5/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test -14.4 Different tests
Wear Other 86% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 92% #7/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test -6.1 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/7 · 2022 Auto Express SUV Tyre Test 10% #10/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test +10 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 97% #2/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test 93% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test +3.9 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 100% #1/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested 100% #1/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 100% #3/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 91% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test +9.3 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 80% #6/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 60% #11/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test +20 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #5/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test 0% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 94% #5/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test 92% #5/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test +1.7 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 93% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 70% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +22.8 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 94% #9/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test 99% #9/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test -4.6 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #6/8 · 2025 EV Tyre Test 96% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test -1.1 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Primacy 4

The Michelin Primacy 4 is widely regarded as a premium, long-lasting touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and consistent wet-weather performance. While it is highly praised for its longevity and safety, some enthusiasts find its handling 'floaty' or lacking in road feedback compared to sport-oriented tires, leading to a polarized experience depending on driving style.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Consistent performance even as the tire wears
  • Strong wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance

Cons

  • Vague steering feel and lack of road feedback
  • Soft sidewalls can feel 'mushy' or 'floaty' during spirited driving
  • High price point compared to competitors
  • Increased noise levels as the tire ages

Observations

  • Users with heavier vehicles or EVs often report a 'floaty' sensation, which some mitigate by increasing tire pressure.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented hatchbacks often find the tire's touring-focused design disappointing compared to UHP alternatives.
  • The tire is frequently noted for transforming the ride quality of vehicles previously fitted with harsh run-flat tires.
Tire B Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

The Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that offers impressive initial grip in both wet and dry conditions. While many users praise its affordability compared to premium brands, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of rapid tread wear and inconsistent long-term durability.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Strong initial dry and wet handling capabilities
  • Quiet operation and good comfort levels when new
  • Predictable and stable cornering performance

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Inconsistent quality control leading to sidewall or shoulder damage
  • Performance degradation as the tire ages
  • Mediocre ride comfort and increased noise levels over time

Observations

  • Users driving heavier vehicles or SUVs, such as the BMW iX1, report severe shoulder wear despite proper alignment.
  • Factory-fitted units on various vehicles have received mixed feedback, with some users reporting premature cracking or structural damage within the first few thousand miles.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Primacy 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Michelin Primacy 4 is largely positive, praising its exceptional wet braking capabilities, impressive longevity, low cabin noise, and smooth ride quality. While some users note limitations in heavy snow or rougher tarmac surfaces, it is widely recommended as a top-tier touring tire for daily driving compared to sportier alternatives like the Pilot Sport series.

r/i20nline_india ·21 upvotes ·2025-07-21

“Review: Michelin Primacy 4 ST I own a 2023 N8 DCT and recently changed all four tyres from the stock CEATs after one of the tyres’ sidewall was punctured on hitting a rather deep pothole at high speed. Cost: INR 9,750 per tyre Existing tyre buyback: INR 1,000 per tyre (~15k kms) Review: I’ve been using the new tyres for a few weeks now and I’m happy with the upgrade. The difference is noticeable, but only if you pay attention. I’d say a non-savvy person won’t notice anything different unless you ask them to pay attention. At low speeds, the road noise is reduced and the vehicle is noticeably silent (almost dead silent if the roads are smooth and the engine is at low revs) and smoother. At high speeds, the noise level difference is not very noticeable due to the engine and wind noise, but the smoothness and grip is noticeably better. That said, I wouldn’t say the stock tyres are bad (in terms of both - noise and grip) as a lot of reviewers like to point out; definitely not a night and day difference for me. Lastly, I believe the fuel efficiency has improved due to the lower rolling resistance, but I don’t have enough data to claim this confidently. My verdict is to only upgrade if your current tyres are worn out. Personally, I don’t think spending close to 40k is worth it for the budget conscious. But if you have the money to spare, you will definitely be happy with the upgrade. Read more”

r/AutomobileRO ·2 upvotes ·2025-09-22

“Am avut primacy 4 pe o electrica. Destul de dezamagit de faptul ca dupa ~ 28.000 km s-au tocit rau de au ajuns cam la 3 mm. Placute la condus, silentioase, dar nu cele mai aderente. Pilot sport 4 pe aceiasi electrica cu primacy 4. Huruie de te doare capul. Aderenta nu o simt neaparat wow fata de primacy 4. Nu le mai suport si abia astept sa le trec pe iarna, oricum asta fiind ultima incaltare cu ele. Pe o termica am primacy 5, si sunt cele mai ok din experienta mea. Cele mai silentioase si aderente din cele 3. Dupa 20.000 km uzura a scazut cam cu 1 mm. Recomandarea mea e sa alegi primacy 5 fara ezitare.”

r/nzev ·1 upvote ·2026-02-11

“Both our Polestar2 (new) and 2016 Leaf (Jap import) arrived with Primacy 4s on them. The FWD Polestar needed fronts replaced at ~35k km and being 245/45 R19s Primacy were too pricey so went with Kumho Ecsta PS71 equivalents for a lot cheaper and negligible difference in performance. The rears on the Polestar are still going strong at 45k km and look like at least 60k km will be likely. We also fitted Kumhos on our previous Leaf and were very satisfied with performance and life.”

r/nzev ·1 upvote ·2026-02-11

“When I bought my freshly imported 2014 Nissan Leaf in Sept 2020 it had 27,xxx km on the odometer and a full set of Michelin Primacy 4 that were sidewall dated from very late 2018, so likely only very low mileage on them. I put another 47,000km on them before replacing with a full set of Toyo Proxes C100 Plus in April 2024 which have also been great. The Michelin fronts were certainly very worn particularly the shoulders. I really rate Toyos so would encourage you to have a look. I’ve since put 21,000km on the Toyos and even after 12,500km, in May 2025 at their most recent WOF, the fronts still measured at 7mm and rears 8mm. P.S I paid $900 total for the 4 x Toyos inc. fitting, disposal etc.”

Top themes
#Wet braking and grip#Ride comfort and low noise#Tread wear and longevity#Comparison with Pilot Sport#Performance on EVs and hybrids

Based on 31 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Primacy 4 B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Nexen

Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better treadwear, noise and dry. Pick the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 82 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 75 vs 57 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 87 vs 78 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 82 vs 77 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Primacy 4
Tire B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.