71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
87/100
19 professional tests
User signal (40%)
70/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better noise and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 75 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 97% | 89% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 93% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 94% | 100% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Fera Sport SU2 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 93 | 40 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 57 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
N Fera Sport SU2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | N Fera Sport SU2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 75 |
| Dry | 78 | 78 |
| Wet | 79 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 82 | 56 |
| Noise | 57 | 87 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 72 |
| Handling | 76 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% #5/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 89% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +7.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #16/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -0.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 91% #2/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -8.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 99% #2/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +0.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 20% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #10/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 92% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +5.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 95% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 97% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 78% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -16.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 84% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -9.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 87% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | +6.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #10/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 100% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -6 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly performance tire that offers impressive initial grip in both wet and dry conditions. While many users praise its affordability compared to premium brands, the consensus is heavily polarized by reports of rapid tread wear and inconsistent long-term durability.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Strong initial dry and wet handling capabilities
- Quiet operation and good comfort levels when new
- Predictable and stable cornering performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Inconsistent quality control leading to sidewall or shoulder damage
- Performance degradation as the tire ages
- Mediocre ride comfort and increased noise levels over time
Observations
- Users driving heavier vehicles or SUVs, such as the BMW iX1, report severe shoulder wear despite proper alignment.
- Factory-fitted units on various vehicles have received mixed feedback, with some users reporting premature cracking or structural damage within the first few thousand miles.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Nexen
75
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better noise and treadwear. Pick the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 87 vs 57 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 82 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 72 vs 58 on treadwear.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.