Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU1

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Dry
78
Wet
81
Snow
76
Comfort
56
Noise
87
Treadwear
72
Handling
75

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N Fera SU4

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Nexen N Fera SU4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
94 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
87
Snow
76
Comfort
88
Noise
91
Treadwear
82
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 13
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
78
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
91
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners 82 91
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 6
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
81
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
87
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 75 87
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
76
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
76
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
SimpleTire owners 78 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 32
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
56
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
88
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 40 –
Tyre Reviews owners 79 87
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 4
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
87
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
91
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 10
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
72
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
82
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 71 81
SimpleTire owners 87 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N Fera SU4 leads by 5
A — Nexen N Fera SU1
75
B — Nexen N Fera SU4
80
Why this score
SourceN Fera SU1N Fera SU4
Tyre Reviews owners 75 80

Scores at a glance

Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Nexen N Fera SU4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Fera SU1Nexen N Fera SU4
Relative Score 75 85
Dry 78 91
Wet 81 87
Snow 76 76
Comfort 56 88
Noise 87 91
Treadwear 72 82
Handling 75 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Nexen N Fera SU1

The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Very low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
  • Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
  • Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
  • Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
  • Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Tire B Nexen N Fera SU4

The Nexen N Fera SU4 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly summer tire that punches well above its price point. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, low noise levels, and superior ride comfort compared to more expensive premium brands. While it is not a dedicated track tire, it serves as an excellent daily driver option for those seeking a balance of performance and economy.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Good longevity for daily commuting and highway driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of precision during aggressive cornering
  • Performance significantly degrades in near-freezing or snowy conditions
  • Occasional reports of sidewall bulges or premature wear under heavy use
  • Not suitable for high-performance track applications

Observations

  • Drivers of heavy vehicles or hot hatches noted that the soft sidewalls can cause a 'rolling' sensation during spirited cornering.
  • Users on luxury sedans (e.g., Lexus, Audi) frequently highlighted the tire's ability to significantly reduce road noise and improve ride quality over stock premium tires.
  • Some owners of high-torque vehicles reported faster tread wear on the front axle compared to lighter, standard passenger cars.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera SU1 B · Nexen N Fera SU4
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available58—
Rim diameters16″ – 24″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
Treadwear warranty25,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen

Nexen

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 88 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 91 vs 78 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 82 vs 72 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 87 vs 81 on wet.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU4

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.