72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
76/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
75/100
105 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
76/100
160 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better snow, noise and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 if comfort, dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus S1 evo2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 75 |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 85 |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 71% | 87% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ventus S1 evo2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 68 | 40 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Fera SU1 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 71 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus S1 evo2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 | N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 75 |
| Dry | 83 | 78 |
| Wet | 81 | 81 |
| Snow | 50 | 76 |
| Comfort | 70 | 56 |
| Noise | 70 | 87 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 72 |
| Handling | 79 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #8/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test | 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +2.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +0.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/6 · 2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 97% #2/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test | 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 20% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #12/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -3.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 86% #4/11 · 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tyre Test | 97% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -10.9 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 80% #4/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -14.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 80% #8/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | -13.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 71% #2/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 87% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -15.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | 100% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -2.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that offers an excellent balance of dry and wet traction at a competitive price point. While many users praise its handling and value compared to premium rivals, consensus is divided regarding its longevity and susceptibility to sidewall damage, with some users reporting rapid tread wear and structural issues on rougher road surfaces.
Pros
- Strong dry and wet grip performance
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Responsive handling and steering feedback
- Generally quiet operation when new
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly on heavier or high-performance vehicles
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Reports of fragile sidewalls prone to bulging or damage
- Performance degradation in cold or near-freezing temperatures
Observations
- Users with heavy SUVs and high-horsepower sedans frequently report significantly shorter tread life, often requiring replacement under 15,000 miles.
- Owners of premium German vehicles (Audi, BMW, Mercedes) note that while the tire is a capable OEM choice, it is often perceived as a 'downgrade' in comfort or longevity compared to top-tier Michelin or Continental alternatives.
- The foam-lined 'sound absorber' variants received mixed feedback, with some users reporting vibrations or balancing issues over time.
The Nexen N Fera SU1 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range summer tire that frequently punches above its weight class, often compared favorably to premium brands like Continental and Michelin. While most users praise its exceptional comfort, low noise levels, and reliable wet/dry grip, a notable segment of reviewers reports concerns regarding premature sidewall cracking and soft sidewall construction that can impact handling precision on heavier or performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Very low road noise and high ride comfort
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Predictable handling characteristics for standard road use
Cons
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking and tread block degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feel or instability on heavy vehicles
- Performance drop-off noted as tread depth decreases
- Not suitable for winter conditions despite occasional mislabeling
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles (e.g., SUVs, EVs, or large sedans) frequently report that the soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation or lack of cornering confidence.
- Users replacing factory-fitted run-flat tires on BMWs and other luxury vehicles consistently report significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Performance-oriented drivers note that the tire lacks the necessary rigidity for track use or aggressive spirited driving compared to dedicated UHP tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 58 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Hankook
75
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better snow, noise and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 if comfort, dry and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 50 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 87 vs 70 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 70 vs 56 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 scores 83 vs 78 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 also compared with
Nexen N Fera SU1 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.