80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
26 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Avon Storm 2 Ultra vs Michelin Road 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
24 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Road 5 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Avon Storm 2 Ultra if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road 5 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Storm 2 Ultra | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road 5 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Storm 2 Ultra | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 87 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road 5 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Storm 2 Ultra | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Storm 2 Ultra leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Storm 2 Ultra | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road 5 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Storm 2 Ultra | Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon Storm 2 Ultra | Michelin Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 85 |
| Dry | 86 | 88 |
| Wet | 70 | 87 |
| Comfort | 83 | 89 |
| Treadwear | 88 | 83 |
| Handling | 75 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Avon Storm 2 Ultra is widely regarded as a high-mileage sport-touring tire that excels in dry-weather stability and longevity. While many riders praise its exceptional value and consistent performance on heavy motorcycles, a subset of users reports concerns regarding wet-weather confidence and a slow warm-up period.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and high mileage capability
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Consistent performance for heavy sport-touring bikes
Cons
- Slow warm-up time in cold or damp conditions
- Inconsistent wet-weather traction for some riders
- Potential for steering wobble or vague front-end feel on specific models
- Performance drop-off when nearing the end of the tread life
Observations
- Users of heavy, high-torque machines like the Hayabusa and ZZR1400 report high satisfaction with stability and wear, though some find them unsuitable for aggressive riding in cold/wet conditions.
- Some riders noted uneven front tire wear patterns, particularly on larger touring models like the Triumph Trophy 1200.
- Owners of middleweight bikes like the SV650 and ER6 report excellent longevity, often exceeding 10,000 miles.
The Michelin Road 5 is widely regarded as a benchmark sport-touring tire, praised for its exceptional wet-weather performance and impressive longevity. While most riders report high confidence in both dry and wet conditions, a significant subset of users has expressed frustration regarding the tire's susceptibility to punctures, which some attribute to its soft carcass and siping design.
Pros
- Class-leading wet weather grip and rider confidence
- Excellent tread life and durability for touring applications
- Dual-compound construction provides a balance of stability and cornering grip
- Strong performance across diverse riding styles, including occasional track use
Cons
- High susceptibility to punctures from road debris
- Soft carcass construction can be prone to structural damage from impacts
- Some users report a lack of feedback compared to dedicated sport tires
- Premium price point compared to competitors
Observations
- Users on torquey middleweight bikes (e.g., 650cc-765cc) report excellent traction and longevity, even under aggressive riding.
- Heavier sport-touring machines (e.g., K1300R, VFR800) benefit from the tire's stability, though some note unique wear patterns on the front tire compared to the rear.
- Commuters on poor-quality tarmac report high mileage but note that the tire's grip can be tested by extreme road surface conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon Storm 2 Ultra | B · Michelin Road 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Avon
85
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Road 5 — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Avon Storm 2 Ultra if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Road 5 scores 87 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Road 5 scores 89 vs 83 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Avon Storm 2 Ultra scores 88 vs 83 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Road 5 scores 80 vs 75 on handling.
Tire A · Avon Storm 2 Ultra
Tire B · Michelin Road 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Avon Storm 2 Ultra also compared with
Michelin Road 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.