74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
13 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Nexen CP672 vs Riken All Star 2 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
56
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen CP672 — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CP672 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | CP672 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CP672 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | CP672 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 57 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CP672 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 82 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CP672 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CP672 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 67 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CP672 leads by 40
Why this score
| Source | CP672 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 37 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CP672 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | CP672 | All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen CP672 | Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 56 |
| Dry | 83 | 73 |
| Wet | 70 | 57 |
| Snow | 90 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 37 |
| Handling | 66 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
56
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen CP672 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly tire that excels in longevity and ride comfort, making it a popular choice for daily commuters. While it offers impressive tread life and low noise levels, user consensus is polarized regarding its performance in adverse weather, with several reports of compromised traction in wet conditions.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and mileage
- High level of ride comfort and smoothness
- Low road noise
- Strong value proposition for the price point
Cons
- Poor wet weather traction and handling
- Tendency to lose grip under hard acceleration
- Inconsistent steering feedback at low speeds
Observations
- Users on SUVs like the SsangYong Korando reported high satisfaction with durability and wet-weather performance.
- Drivers of higher-performance vehicles, such as the BMW 5-series and Hyundai Genesis, noted issues with traction loss during aggressive acceleration.
The Riken All Star 2 is viewed as a polarizing budget-tier tire that serves as a temporary solution rather than a long-term investment. While some users appreciate its value proposition for light-duty city driving, others report significant concerns regarding premature wear and overall durability compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Attractive low price point
- Acceptable noise levels for budget-conscious drivers
- Adequate stopping performance in light city conditions
Cons
- Poor tread longevity and durability
- Failure to meet safety inspection standards within a year
- Inconsistent quality compared to premium tire brands
Observations
- Users operating smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daewoo Matiz reported acceptable noise levels and curb-climbing capability.
- The tire is frequently criticized when used as a direct replacement for higher-end performance tires, highlighting a significant gap in material longevity.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen CP672 | B · Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 41 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 460 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Nexen
56
/ 100
Riken
Winner: Nexen CP672 — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen CP672 scores 77 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen CP672 scores 70 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen CP672 scores 83 vs 73 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen CP672 scores 75 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen CP672
Tire B · Riken All Star 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen CP672 also compared with
Riken All Star 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.