Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Nexen N FERA RU1 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 82 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 94% | 93% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 75 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 95% | 90% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 98% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 76 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 36 | 74 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 78 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Crugen HP91 | N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 71 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Crugen HP91 | Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 77 |
| Dry | 85 | 82 |
| Wet | 87 | 79 |
| Comfort | 79 | 76 |
| Noise | 36 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 78 |
| Handling | 78 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +1.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 89% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +15.2 | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 91% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 91% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -0.4 | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Gravel | 97% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 97% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +0.4 | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Gravel | 94% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 97% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -2.9 | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Mud | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 88% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +11.6 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -2.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 81% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 64% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +17.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 13% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +7.5 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 97% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 95% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | +5.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Crugen HP91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While many users praise its comfort and handling, there is a notable polarization regarding tread longevity, with some owners reporting excellent mileage and others experiencing premature wear.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Responsive handling and steering feedback
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reported across different vehicles
- Occasional reports of sidewall or structural integrity issues
- Some users report a softer compound that wears faster than expected
Observations
- Owners of larger SUVs like the Kia Sorento and Ford Kuga generally report high satisfaction with both longevity and performance.
- Users driving on rougher road surfaces, such as those in South Africa or Ukraine, reported faster degradation or structural issues.
- Some Hyundai Santa Fe owners noted dissatisfaction with wet-weather performance and rapid tread wear compared to other vehicle owners.
The Nexen N Fera RU1 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction, often outperforming more expensive premium brands in these categories. While many users report excellent longevity and wet/dry grip, a subset of owners experiences inconsistent performance, particularly regarding tread wear and high-speed stability on specific vehicle platforms.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Superior ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
- Impressive tread life for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some reports of premature chipping or rapid degradation
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback or vibrations at highway speeds
- Performance drop-off in colder temperatures or wet conditions for some users
- Lack of responsiveness during aggressive or high-speed maneuvers
Observations
- SUV owners (e.g., Volvo XC90, VW Tiguan) generally praise the comfort and longevity, though some report concerns with emergency handling.
- Users on larger rim sizes (e.g., 20-inch) have reported specific issues with sidewall flex and vibration that were not present on smaller, higher-profile sizes.
- Performance on modern EVs (e.g., Kia EV6) appears polarized, with some users finding the handling characteristics unsuitable for the vehicle's dynamics.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Crugen HP91 | B · Nexen N FERA RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 420 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better noise and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP91 if wet, handling and dry matter most to you.
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 74 vs 36 on noise.
Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 78 vs 67 on treadwear.
Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 87 vs 79 on wet.
Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.