Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Nexen N FERA RU1 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Crugen HP91

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Crugen HP91 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
78/100
21 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Comfort
79
Noise
36
Treadwear
67
Handling
78

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen N FERA RU1

Summer High Performance tires

Nexen N FERA RU1 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
75/100
25 owner reviews
Dry
82
Wet
79
Comfort
76
Noise
74
Treadwear
78
Handling
71

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better noise and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP91 if wet, handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 3
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
85
B — Nexen N FERA RU1
82
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91N FERA RU1
Professional tests (TWG score) 82 81
Tyre Reviews owners 89 82
Dry Braking (% of best) 94% 93%
Dry Handling (% of best) 97% 98%

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 8
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
87
B — Nexen N FERA RU1
79
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91N FERA RU1
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 82
Tyre Reviews owners 86 75
Wet Braking (% of best) 95% 90%
Wet Handling (% of best) 96% 98%

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 3
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
79
B — Nexen N FERA RU1
76
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91N FERA RU1
Tyre Reviews owners 79 76

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) N FERA RU1 leads by 38
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
36
B — Nexen N FERA RU1
74
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91N FERA RU1
Professional tests (TWG score) 36 74

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) N FERA RU1 leads by 11
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
67
B — Nexen N FERA RU1
78
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91N FERA RU1
Tyre Reviews owners 67 78

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HP91 leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HP91
78
B — Nexen N FERA RU1
71
Why this score
SourceCrugen HP91N FERA RU1
Tyre Reviews owners 78 71
DriverReviews owners 82 –

Scores at a glance

Kumho Crugen HP91 vs Nexen N FERA RU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP91Nexen N FERA RU1
Relative Score 73 77
Dry 85 82
Wet 87 79
Comfort 79 76
Noise 36 74
Treadwear 67 78
Handling 78 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Test data

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryTire ATire BΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 94% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +1.1 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -1 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 89% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +15.2 Different tests
Grass Traction Grass 91% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 91% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -0.4 Different tests
Gravel Handling Gravel 97% #7/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 97% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +0.4 Different tests
Gravel Traction Gravel 94% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 97% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -2.9 Different tests
Mud Traction Mud 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 88% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +11.6 Different tests
Noise Other 95% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 98% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -2.7 Different tests
Price Other 81% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 64% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +17.1 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 13% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +7.5 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 97% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +1.9 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 95% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test +5.1 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 96% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test -1.7 Different tests
From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Crugen HP91

The Kumho Crugen HP91 is widely regarded as a high-value performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While many users praise its comfort and handling, there is a notable polarization regarding tread longevity, with some owners reporting excellent mileage and others experiencing premature wear.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry traction
  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Responsive handling and steering feedback

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life reported across different vehicles
  • Occasional reports of sidewall or structural integrity issues
  • Some users report a softer compound that wears faster than expected

Observations

  • Owners of larger SUVs like the Kia Sorento and Ford Kuga generally report high satisfaction with both longevity and performance.
  • Users driving on rougher road surfaces, such as those in South Africa or Ukraine, reported faster degradation or structural issues.
  • Some Hyundai Santa Fe owners noted dissatisfaction with wet-weather performance and rapid tread wear compared to other vehicle owners.
Tire B Nexen N FERA RU1

The Nexen N Fera RU1 is widely regarded as a high-value touring tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction, often outperforming more expensive premium brands in these categories. While many users report excellent longevity and wet/dry grip, a subset of owners experiences inconsistent performance, particularly regarding tread wear and high-speed stability on specific vehicle platforms.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Superior ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong wet and dry traction for daily driving
  • Impressive tread life for many users

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some reports of premature chipping or rapid degradation
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback or vibrations at highway speeds
  • Performance drop-off in colder temperatures or wet conditions for some users
  • Lack of responsiveness during aggressive or high-speed maneuvers

Observations

  • SUV owners (e.g., Volvo XC90, VW Tiguan) generally praise the comfort and longevity, though some report concerns with emergency handling.
  • Users on larger rim sizes (e.g., 20-inch) have reported specific issues with sidewall flex and vibration that were not present on smaller, higher-profile sizes.
  • Performance on modern EVs (e.g., Kia EV6) appears polarized, with some users finding the handling characteristics unsuitable for the vehicle's dynamics.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP91 B · Nexen N FERA RU1
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Nexen

Winner: Nexen N FERA RU1 — better noise and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Crugen HP91 if wet, handling and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 74 vs 36 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N FERA RU1 scores 78 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 87 vs 79 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire B · Nexen N FERA RU1

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.