75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Nexen N Priz 4S vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Priz 4S | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | N Priz 4S | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 78 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Priz 4S | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | N Priz 4S | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | N Priz 4S | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | N Priz 4S | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Priz 4S | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 80 |
| Dry | 83 | 83 |
| Wet | 71 | 78 |
| Snow | 71 | – |
| Comfort | 82 | 86 |
| Noise | 97 | – |
| Treadwear | 75 | 75 |
| Handling | 66 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Nexen N Priz 4S presents a polarized user experience, often praised for its affordability and competent performance in dry and light snowy conditions. However, significant inconsistencies in wet-weather traction and tread longevity lead to widely varying reports, ranging from excellent value to safety concerns.
Pros
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
- Reliable traction in dry conditions
- Effective performance in light to moderate snow
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent and potentially dangerous wet-weather grip
- Reports of rapid or uneven tread wear
- Poor lateral stability and understeer in challenging conditions
- Performance degradation over time
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles reported significant improvements in snow traction compared to stock tires.
- Drivers of heavier or high-performance vehicles noted more pronounced issues with wet-weather understeer and premature wear.
- Performance appears highly subjective based on regional climate, with users in mountainous or high-precipitation areas reporting lower satisfaction.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Priz 4S | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Nexen
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 78 vs 71 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 82 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen N Priz 4S
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Nexen N Priz 4S also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.