66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho KL33 vs Nexen N Priz RH7 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
52 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen N Priz RH7 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
N Priz RH7 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 73 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
N Priz RH7 leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 72 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 59 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 49 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 10 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
N Priz RH7 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 69 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
N Priz RH7 leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 62 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
KL33 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | KL33 | N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 63 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho KL33 | Nexen N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 79 |
| Dry | 73 | 88 |
| Wet | 65 | 80 |
| Snow | – | 64 |
| Comfort | 73 | 86 |
| Noise | – | 89 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 77 |
| Handling | 65 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho KL33 presents a polarizing ownership experience, often serving as an OEM choice that delivers competent dry-weather performance and comfort when new. However, the consensus is significantly marred by reports of premature tread degradation, including chunking and delamination, alongside inconsistent long-term durability and poor manufacturer warranty support.
Pros
- Strong initial dry traction and braking performance
- Competitive price point offering good value for money
- Generally comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
- Satisfactory handling characteristics for standard suburban driving
Cons
- Significant reports of tread block chipping, chunking, and premature wear
- Concerns regarding structural integrity and potential delamination
- Increased road noise as the tire reaches mid-life
- Unresponsive customer service regarding warranty claims
Observations
- Users on heavier SUVs and minivans like the Kia Carnival and Audi Q5 reported faster tread wear and lack of cornering feedback.
- Drivers of diesel-powered SUVs noted better longevity and satisfaction compared to those with gasoline-powered or luxury-segment vehicles.
The Nexen N Priz RH7 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly tire that offers impressive ride comfort, low road noise, and reliable dry and wet traction for daily commuting. While many users praise its value and performance, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity, with some reporting premature wear and structural issues under heavier loads.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction in dry and wet conditions
- Predictable handling for daily driving
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some reports of premature wear
- Soft sidewalls may not be suitable for heavy towing or high-load applications
- Occasional reports of structural failures, such as sidewall bulges or blowouts
- Mixed performance in winter conditions
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles, such as Suburbans, noted that the soft sidewalls can feel unstable when towing or under heavy load.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mini, S10 pickup) frequently report high satisfaction with ride comfort and handling.
- Longevity reports are highly polarized, ranging from users achieving over 75,000 km to others needing replacement in under 25,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho KL33 | B · Nexen N Priz RH7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Kumho
79
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen N Priz RH7 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 77 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 88 vs 73 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 80 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Priz RH7 scores 86 vs 73 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho KL33
Tire B · Nexen N Priz RH7
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho KL33 also compared with
Nexen N Priz RH7 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.