60
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Falken SN828 vs Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Sumitomo
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
67/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Falken SN828 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
SN828 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | SN828 | HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
HTR A/S P02 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | SN828 | HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 75 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | SN828 | HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 70 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
SN828 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | SN828 | HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 50 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
HTR A/S P02 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | SN828 | HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
HTR A/S P02 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | SN828 | HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 46 | 75 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken SN828 | Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 76 |
| Dry | 81 | 80 |
| Wet | 54 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | 76 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 90 |
| Handling | 46 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
Tire A
76
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Falken SN828 is a polarizing budget-oriented tire that receives highly inconsistent feedback regarding its wet-weather performance and noise levels. While some users praise its value, dry grip, and comfort, others report significant safety concerns during rain and disappointing tread longevity.
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry weather traction
- Comfortable ride quality
- Useful integrated tire wear indicators
Cons
- Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
- Subpar tread life and durability
- Unpredictable handling in damp conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daihatsu Cuore reported significant traction loss in wet conditions.
- Owners of compact hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla noted higher-than-expected road noise levels at moderate highway speeds.
The Sumitomo H/TR AS P02 is generally regarded as a durable, high-value all-season tire that offers reliable longevity and competent performance in varied weather conditions. While users appreciate its impressive tread life and snow capability, some note a lack of steering responsiveness and a firmer ride quality compared to premium alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity exceeding 40,000 miles
- Reliable traction in light snow conditions
- Strong value proposition for the price point
- Solid upgrade over worn-out winter or budget tires
Cons
- Noticeable delay in steering turn-in response
- Compound loses grip and responsiveness as the tire ages
- Ride comfort is perceived as somewhat harsh or stiff
Observations
- Users report consistent high-mileage performance, with tread depth remaining viable well past the 40,000-mile mark.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken SN828 | B · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Falken
76
/ 100
Sumitomo
Winner: Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 — better treadwear, handling and wet. Pick the Falken SN828 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 scores 90 vs 54 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 scores 75 vs 46 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Falken SN828 scores 76 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 scores 75 vs 54 on wet.
Tire A · Falken SN828
Tire B · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
More comparisons
Also compared with
Falken SN828 also compared with
Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.