Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Falken SN828 vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken SN828

Summer Touring tires

Falken SN828 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
54
Snow
–
Comfort
76
Noise
–
Treadwear
54
Handling
46
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

Michelin Defender T+H tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Dry
94
Wet
91
Snow
76
Comfort
89
Noise
87
Treadwear
90
Handling
92
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Defender T+H — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 13
A
81
B
94
Why this score
SourceSN828Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners – 92
Tyre Reviews owners 81 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 37
A
54
B
91
Why this score
SourceSN828Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 54 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
76
Why this score
SourceSN828Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners – 73

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 13
A
76
B
89
Why this score
SourceSN828Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 76 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
87

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 36
A
54
B
90
Why this score
SourceSN828Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 54 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 46
A
46
B
92
Why this score
SourceSN828Defender T+H
Tyre Reviews owners 46 –

Scores at a glance

CategoryFalken SN828Michelin Defender T+H
Relative Score 60 91
Dry 81 94
Wet 54 91
Snow – 76
Comfort 76 89
Noise – 87
Treadwear 54 90
Handling 46 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken SN828

The Falken SN828 is a polarizing budget-oriented tire that receives highly inconsistent feedback regarding its wet-weather performance and noise levels. While some users praise its value, dry grip, and comfort, others report significant safety concerns during rain and disappointing tread longevity.

Pros

  • High value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong dry weather traction
  • Comfortable ride quality
  • Useful integrated tire wear indicators

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
  • Subpar tread life and durability
  • Unpredictable handling in damp conditions

Observations

  • Users driving smaller, lighter vehicles like the Daihatsu Cuore reported significant traction loss in wet conditions.
  • Owners of compact hatchbacks like the Toyota Corolla noted higher-than-expected road noise levels at moderate highway speeds.
Tire B Michelin Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken SN828 B · Michelin Defender T+H
CategorySummer Touring tiresPremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Michelin

Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Defender T+H scores 92 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Defender T+H scores 91 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Defender T+H scores 90 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Defender T+H scores 94 vs 81 on dry.

Tire A · Falken SN828
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.