–
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
–/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Toyo A20 vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictOnly Yokohama ADVAN A048 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A20 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 96 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A20 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 53 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A20 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 56 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A20 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 51 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | A20 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo A20 | Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 64 |
| Dry | – | 96 |
| Wet | – | 53 |
| Comfort | – | 56 |
| Treadwear | – | 51 |
| Handling | – | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Yokohama Advan A048 is widely regarded as a premier semi-slick tire for lightweight sports cars, particularly the Lotus and Caterham platforms. While it offers exceptional dry-weather performance and communicative feedback, users note that it requires precise pressure and temperature management to reach its full potential.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
- High level of steering feedback and handling precision
- Progressive breakaway characteristics
- Strong performance on lightweight track-focused vehicles
Cons
- Rapid tread wear during track sessions
- High road noise levels
- Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning in deep standing water
Observations
- Lotus-specific variants feature unique sidewall stiffness that significantly alters handling characteristics compared to standard versions.
- Drivers of lightweight chassis report that the tire's stiff sidewalls provide excellent braking performance, often preventing ABS intervention.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo A20 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Toyo
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Only Yokohama ADVAN A048 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Toyo A20
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
More comparisons
Also compared with
Toyo A20 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN A048 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.