67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A048 if handling, dry and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A048 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 96 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 53 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A048 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 56 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 51 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A048 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 64 |
| Dry | 80 | 96 |
| Wet | 67 | 53 |
| Snow | 20 | – |
| Comfort | 50 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 51 |
| Handling | 57 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Yokohama Advan A048 is widely regarded as a premier semi-slick tire for lightweight sports cars, particularly the Lotus and Caterham platforms. While it offers exceptional dry-weather performance and communicative feedback, users note that it requires precise pressure and temperature management to reach its full potential.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
- High level of steering feedback and handling precision
- Progressive breakaway characteristics
- Strong performance on lightweight track-focused vehicles
Cons
- Rapid tread wear during track sessions
- High road noise levels
- Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning in deep standing water
Observations
- Lotus-specific variants feature unique sidewall stiffness that significantly alters handling characteristics compared to standard versions.
- Drivers of lightweight chassis report that the tire's stiff sidewalls provide excellent braking performance, often preventing ABS intervention.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
BFGoodrich
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage T/A — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A048 if handling, dry and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 75 vs 51 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 81 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 96 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 67 vs 53 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN A048 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.