83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
91/100
14 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
76 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
85
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
108 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Proxes CF2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 85 |
| Dry | 88 | 88 |
| Wet | 82 | 82 |
| Comfort | 86 | 86 |
| Noise | 85 | – |
| Treadwear | 78 | 85 |
| Handling | 83 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
85
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/44 · 2022 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 4% #27/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | +46.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is widely regarded as a high-value, premium-touring tire that excels in comfort, low noise, and wet-weather confidence. While most users praise its balanced performance and competitive pricing, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding rapid tread wear and a noticeable decline in grip as the tires approach the end of their service life.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily driving
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and stable cornering characteristics
Cons
- Reports of rapid tread wear and premature degradation
- Noticeable decline in wet grip performance as tread depth decreases
- Sidewalls perceived as fragile or prone to damage by some users
- Performance drop-off in near-freezing temperatures
Observations
- Some users of heavier vehicles, including EVs, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and stiff sidewalls.
- Drivers of high-torque or turbocharged vehicles occasionally noted traction issues (wheel spin) during acceleration, suggesting the tire may struggle with aggressive power delivery.
- Users who upsized their tire profile reported improved ride comfort and corrected speedometer accuracy.
The Toyo Proxes CF2 is widely regarded as a high-value, well-rounded touring tire that excels in comfort, noise reduction, and wet-weather performance. While a small subset of users reported issues with premature hardening or structural cracking, the vast majority of drivers praise its predictable handling and impressive longevity, often comparing it favorably to more expensive premium brands.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling
- Impressive tread life and durability for daily driving
- Low rolling resistance contributing to fuel efficiency
Cons
- Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
- Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
- Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
- Occasional reports of structural failure or premature wear on specific vehicles
Observations
- Users with compact cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Toyota Yaris) frequently report significant improvements in ride quality and noise levels over factory-fitted tires.
- Drivers of older or lighter vehicles often highlight the tire's ability to provide a 'predictable' and 'fun' driving experience, though some note that the soft sidewalls are less suited for high-performance sports driving.
- Owners in hot climates (e.g., Greece, Cyprus) noted that the rubber compound may be prone to premature aging or cracking compared to temperate regions.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with users praising it as a strong, high-value touring tire that often rivals more expensive premium brands like Michelin. Reviewers and owners highlight its good performance in both dry and wet conditions, though longevity estimates in professional tests show some variation. Overall, it is seen as a significant upgrade over budget or stock tires and a great choice for everyday driving.
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
r/TyreReviews
·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
r/AutomobileRO
·2 upvotes ·2025-03-23
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
Top themes
#wet and dry grip#touring tire characteristics#price and value comparison#longevity and mileage#EV compatibility symbols#comparison with Michelin Primacy
Based on 13 community posts
Tire B
Toyo Proxes CF2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Hankook
85
/ 100
Toyo
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 85 vs 78 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also compared with
Toyo Proxes CF2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.