80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Vredestein Quatrac 2 vs Yokohama BluEarth RV02 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
62/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
77/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein Quatrac 2 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth RV02 if handling and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 2 leads by 49
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth RV02 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 81 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 2 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 26 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 2 leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth RV02 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Quatrac 2 | BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 59 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac 2 | Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 64 |
| Dry | 83 | 34 |
| Wet | 81 | 84 |
| Snow | 70 | – |
| Comfort | 86 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 85 | 59 |
| Handling | 59 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Vredestein Quatrac 2 is widely regarded as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in adverse weather conditions, particularly snow, ice, and wet surfaces. While users consistently praise its longevity and reliable traction, some note trade-offs in road noise and a slight reduction in fuel efficiency due to rolling resistance.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and wet conditions
- Impressive tread life and durability over high mileage
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Consistent performance even as the tread wears down
Cons
- Higher road noise levels compared to dedicated summer tires
- Increased rolling resistance leading to a slight decrease in fuel economy
- Perceived lack of sidewall rigidity and road feedback
- Occasional reports of susceptibility to punctures when new
Observations
- Users operating AWD vehicles, such as Subarus, report high satisfaction with the tire's versatility across varied terrains and climates.
- Drivers of diesel-powered sedans noted that the tire maintains superior grip levels compared to premium alternatives even as the tread approaches the end of its service life.
The Yokohama BluEarth RV02 is widely regarded as a high-comfort, stable tire specifically engineered for MPVs and SUVs with higher centers of gravity. While users consistently praise its superior wet-weather grip and noise suppression, long-term satisfaction is somewhat tempered by reports of inconsistent tread longevity and potential material degradation over time.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry surface grip
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Improved vehicle stability for tall-profile vehicles like MPVs and SUVs
- Competitive fuel efficiency
Cons
- Noticeable increase in noise and decrease in comfort as tread wears down
- Reports of premature sidewall or tread cracking
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users noting rapid wear due to softer compounds
Observations
- Users specifically noted that the tire significantly improves stability and reduces body roll in MPVs like the Toyota Vellfire.
- Drivers of SUVs, such as the Hyundai Tucson and Nissan Qashqai, reported a marked improvement in handling and wet-weather confidence compared to OEM tire options.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac 2 | B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
80
/ 100
Vredestein
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac 2 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth RV02 if handling and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 83 vs 34 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 86 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Quatrac 2 scores 85 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 scores 80 vs 59 on handling.
Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 2
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth RV02
More comparisons
Also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac 2 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth RV02 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.