Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Vredestein Quatrac 3 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Vredestein

Vredestein Quatrac 3

All Season High Performance tires

Vredestein Quatrac 3 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
49 owner reviews
Dry
81
Wet
86
Snow
100
Comfort
77
Treadwear
76
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
100 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
71
Snow
–
Comfort
77
Treadwear
74
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Vredestein Quatrac 3 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Quatrac 3 is stronger on wet. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling and dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Neova AD08 leads by 12
A — Vredestein Quatrac 3
81
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
93
Why this score
SourceQuatrac 3Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 81 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Quatrac 3 leads by 15
A — Vredestein Quatrac 3
86
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
71
Why this score
SourceQuatrac 3Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 86 72

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Vredestein Quatrac 3
100
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
–
Why this score
SourceQuatrac 3Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 100 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Vredestein Quatrac 3
77
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
77
Why this score
SourceQuatrac 3Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 77 74

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Quatrac 3 leads by 2
A — Vredestein Quatrac 3
76
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
74
Why this score
SourceQuatrac 3Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 76 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Neova AD08 leads by 14
A — Vredestein Quatrac 3
76
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
90
Why this score
SourceQuatrac 3Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 76 90
DriverReviews owners 84 –

Scores at a glance

Vredestein Quatrac 3 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Quatrac 3Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 80 79
Dry 81 93
Wet 86 71
Snow 100 –
Comfort 77 77
Treadwear 76 74
Handling 76 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Vredestein Quatrac 3

The Vredestein Quatrac 3 is widely regarded as a highly capable all-season tire that excels in adverse weather conditions, particularly snow, ice, and mud. While users consistently praise its winter performance and safety, the consensus is that it functions as a compromise, with some users reporting increased road noise as the tread wears and variable longevity depending on vehicle weight and driving style.

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slushy conditions.
  • Strong, predictable performance in wet and cold weather.
  • Provides a reliable, safe alternative to dedicated winter tires for rural or unpredictable climates.
  • Good value proposition compared to premium competitors.

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise and 'droning' as the tire wears past the 10,000-mile mark.
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear on heavier vehicles or under high-load conditions.
  • Noticeable compromise in dry-weather handling and steering sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires.
  • Occasional reports of high-pitched noise or 'hissing' on damp road surfaces.

Observations

  • Users with lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) generally report better tread longevity and satisfaction compared to those with heavier estates or SUVs.
  • The tire is frequently praised for transforming the comfort and road-holding of smaller vehicles, such as the Mazda MX5 or Ford Fiesta.
  • Heavy-duty use, such as towing or driving on rough, twisty roads, significantly accelerates tread wear.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

The Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 (and its successor, the AD09) is widely regarded as a premier dual-purpose tire that excels in dry-weather performance and steering feedback. While it offers impressive grip and predictability for track days and spirited canyon driving, users note that it requires proper heat management and can become greasy if overdriven or pushed beyond its thermal limits.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
  • Sharp, communicative steering response and feedback
  • Stiff sidewall construction providing excellent turn-in precision
  • Surprisingly good wet-weather performance for a 200TW tire
  • Better tread life and durability compared to many dedicated track-focused tires

Cons

  • Can become 'greasy' or lose grip when overheated during extended track sessions
  • Increased road noise compared to standard summer tires
  • Susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water
  • Potential for tread chunking if driven aggressively on highly abrasive track surfaces

Observations

  • Lightweight sports cars (e.g., Lotus Elise, Mazda MX-5) report high satisfaction with the tire's responsiveness and feedback.
  • High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., 500+ whp M340i, 700whp builds) note that the tire provides excellent traction for street use, though some users with 400+ hp suggest even stickier compounds for pure drag-strip performance.
  • Users on 20-inch wheels occasionally report issues with tire uniformity or balancing, though this is less common on smaller diameter setups.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Quatrac 3 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresSummer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein

Yokohama

Too close to call: Vredestein Quatrac 3 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Quatrac 3 is stronger on wet. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling and dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Quatrac 3 scores 86 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 90 vs 76 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 93 vs 81 on dry.

Tire A · Vredestein Quatrac 3
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.