81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
4 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
38 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better snow, dry and wet. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 5 if handling and comfort matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 82 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 99% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 90% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 79 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | 46 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 77 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 92% | 61% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 83% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 5 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Quatrac 5 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 82 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Vredestein Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 78 |
| Dry | 88 | 80 |
| Wet | 85 | 80 |
| Snow | 75 | 59 |
| Comfort | 81 | 85 |
| Noise | 76 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 82 |
| Handling | 73 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 96% #6/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | +2.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | -9.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #7/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test | 81% #6/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test | +5.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 92% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 99% #6/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test | -7.3 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 96% #10/11 · 2020 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | 78% #2/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test | +17.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 81% #10/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 72% #5/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | +9.3 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 100% #1/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 73% #5/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | +26.5 | Same test |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tyre Test | -88.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% #9/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 61% #7/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | +30.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #3/7 · 2020 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | 83% #7/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | +16 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 84% #6/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | 82% #9/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | +2 | Same test |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #4/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0% #7/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 95% #7/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | -8.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 95% #8/9 · 2018 AMS All Season Tyre Test | +1 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
- Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.
Cons
- Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
- Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.
Observations
- Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
- Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
The Vredestein Quatrac 5 is widely regarded as a competent and versatile all-season tire that excels in comfort and noise reduction. While it provides reliable performance across varied climates, user experiences regarding durability and extreme winter traction are polarized, making it a strong choice for moderate climates rather than harsh, alpine conditions.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low cabin noise levels
- Strong performance in wet and cold, non-frozen conditions
- Good value for money and fuel efficiency
- Consistent handling characteristics across varying temperatures
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature edge wear
- Limited traction on deep snow or packed ice
- Reports of sidewall bulges in some instances
- Soft compound can feel less precise during spirited dry-weather driving
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile sizes can result in a harsh ride, whereas standard profiles offer superior comfort.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those frequently carrying heavy loads reported faster tread wear and potential for edge scrubbing.
- Owners of AWD vehicles generally reported higher satisfaction with winter traction compared to those with FWD or RWD setups.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin CrossClimate+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Vredestein Quatrac 5
The Vredestein Quatrac 5 receives generally positive reviews on retail and testing sites for its price and balance of capabilities, but real-world community feedback is more mixed, particularly regarding its snow performance and longevity. While some users praise them as great all-weather tires for light winter conditions and rain, others note they struggle in heavy snow compared to dedicated winter tires and may lose traction in damp conditions as they wear down.
r/MitsubishiMirage
·36 upvotes ·2025-12-27
“Vredestein Quatrac 5 Photo taken on October 17, 2025. This was during one of your first snowstorms in the Wasatch in Utah. This was at Guardsman’s Pass before it closed for the season, at 9717’ (2962 m). I’ve had the Quatrac 5 since Nay 20th, they’re really not great for considerable snow and I will be going to studded tires again in the near future. Last season I had the Hakkapeliitta 10 (175/65/14) and that was considerably more grippy. Read more”
r/Miata
·25 upvotes ·2021-12-28
“Did great in the snow. With vredestein quatrac 5's in everybody's favorite 205/50/R15s”
r/cars
·1 upvote ·2019-07-21
“A guy on YouTube vlogged his experience with the quatrac 5 in his mirage. It's a good all weather tire for the occasional blast of snow but is by no means a substitute for actual snow tires.”
r/Miata
·1 upvote ·2021-12-29
“Are these Quatrac5 new ? After 15k miles my rear wheels are struggling to put down traction on damp roads if I am not real gentle on gas pedal on first gear from stop go traffic.”
Top themes
#snow and winter performance#wet and rain handling#value and price#tread wear and longevity#tire size availability
Based on 10 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate+ | B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Michelin
78
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better snow, dry and wet. Pick the Vredestein Quatrac 5 if handling and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 59 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac 5 scores 82 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 88 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 85 vs 80 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate+ also compared with
Vredestein Quatrac 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.