83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
29 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Vredestein Snowtrac 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
73/100
2 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Vredestein Snowtrac 5 are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is stronger on treadwear, handling and wet. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 is stronger on noise and snow.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 90 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 87 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 93% | 90% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Snowtrac 5 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 90 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 94% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 100% | 98% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Snowtrac 5 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | 72 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Vredestein Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 82 |
| Dry | 89 | 87 |
| Wet | 86 | 82 |
| Snow | 82 | 86 |
| Comfort | 85 | 85 |
| Noise | 59 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 80 |
| Handling | 88 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 98% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +0.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #3/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 99% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 98% #2/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 83% #9/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +15.3 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #3/6 · The BEST Performance Winter Tyres for 2024 / 2025 | 99% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 73% #7/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 66% #8/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +7 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 90% #8/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | 81% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +9.1 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 74% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 46% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +28.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | 6% #18/51 · 2018 51 Winter Tyre Shootout | +14.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 94% #8/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | 97% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.5 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 100% #1/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 98% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +2.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 90% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +4.2 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #7/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | 0% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #6/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | 90% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +2.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #4/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 97% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +1.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is widely regarded as a premium, highly balanced winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions while offering exceptional comfort and low noise levels. Most users report high levels of confidence in varied winter weather, though a small minority of users report inconsistent performance in severe snow and ice, and some note that steering response is less sharp than dedicated performance-focused alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of cabin comfort and low road noise
- Strong, predictable grip on snow and slush
- Good balance of dry handling and rolling resistance
- Solid tread life and durability for a performance winter tire
Cons
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Steering feel can be perceived as 'soft' or 'jelly' compared to summer tires
- Performance can drop off in temperatures above 8-10°C
- Inconsistent feedback regarding extreme ice traction
Observations
- EV and hybrid owners frequently praise the tire for its low rolling resistance and quiet operation.
- Drivers of high-performance RWD vehicles report that while the tire provides excellent grip, it may feel less stiff and sharp during aggressive cornering compared to summer counterparts.
- Users on larger wheel diameters (20-inch) report that the tire maintains high comfort levels without sacrificing handling.
The Vredestein Snowtrac 5 is highly regarded for its exceptional traction in winter conditions, particularly on snow and ice. Users consistently praise its wet-weather performance and low noise levels, positioning it as a reliable and cost-effective choice for various vehicle types.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and handling in deep snow and on icy surfaces
- Strong performance and stability in wet road conditions
- Low road noise levels across various surface types
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Limited long-term data regarding tread wear longevity
- Perceived as expensive by some users depending on the specific vehicle application
- Inconsistent availability compared to major market leaders
Observations
- Lightweight vehicles, such as the Smart Fortwo, benefit significantly from the tire's responsive handling and snow-clearing capabilities.
- Small commercial vehicles like the Peugeot Partner report high satisfaction regarding noise comfort and wet-weather safety.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Vredestein Snowtrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Continental
82
/ 100
Vredestein
Too close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Vredestein Snowtrac 5 are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is stronger on treadwear, handling and wet. Vredestein Snowtrac 5 is stronger on noise and snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 scores 72 vs 59 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 89 vs 80 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 86 vs 82 on wet.
Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Tire B · Vredestein Snowtrac 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also compared with
Vredestein Snowtrac 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.