Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 84 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 93% | 97% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 99% | 93% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 95% | 91% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 86% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 94% | 90% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 80 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 78 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 64 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ventus Prime 4 | Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 77 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | Vredestein Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 78 |
| Dry | 88 | 87 |
| Wet | 82 | 84 |
| Comfort | 86 | 85 |
| Noise | 85 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 64 |
| Handling | 83 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 82% #17/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | -17.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #13/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | -4 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | 98% #9/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | +0.4 | Same test |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 82% #6/8 · 2023 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 68% #12/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +14.1 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 90% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -8.3 | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 83% #8/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 86% #6/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | -2.7 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 57% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 100% #16/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -42.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #11/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 96% #3/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +3.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 79% #6/13 · Tyre Reviews Best Summer Touring Tyres | 82% #3/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | -3.1 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 63% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 90% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | -27.4 | Same test |
| Wear | Other | 77% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 34% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | +43.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 33% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | -20.8 | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Sand | 93% #5/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 89% #2/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +4.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | -6.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | 95% #2/7 · The Best Touring Tyres for 2025 Tested | +0.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | 80% #9/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | +15 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 80% #11/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | 80% #8/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 85% #6/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | 80% #7/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | +4.5 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 99% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 93% #8/10 · 2024 Motorhome Summer Tyre Test | +6.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 95% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 91% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +4.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 86% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/8 · 2024 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | -11.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | 90% #1/10 · 2022 AZ SUV Tyre Test | +3.7 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is widely regarded as a high-value, premium-touring tire that excels in comfort, low noise, and wet-weather confidence. While most users praise its balanced performance and competitive pricing, a subset of drivers reports concerns regarding rapid tread wear and a noticeable decline in grip as the tires approach the end of their service life.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet and dry grip performance for daily driving
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and stable cornering characteristics
Cons
- Reports of rapid tread wear and premature degradation
- Noticeable decline in wet grip performance as tread depth decreases
- Sidewalls perceived as fragile or prone to damage by some users
- Performance drop-off in near-freezing temperatures
Observations
- Some users of heavier vehicles, including EVs, reported faster-than-expected tread wear and stiff sidewalls.
- Drivers of high-torque or turbocharged vehicles occasionally noted traction issues (wheel spin) during acceleration, suggesting the tire may struggle with aggressive power delivery.
- Users who upsized their tire profile reported improved ride comfort and corrected speedometer accuracy.
The Vredestein Ultrac is widely regarded as a comfortable, high-performance touring tire that excels in wet weather conditions and provides a refined, quiet ride. While many users praise its daily driving capabilities and steering feedback, the tire experiences a significant divide in user experience regarding tread longevity, with reports ranging from exceptional durability to premature, rapid wear.
Pros
- Outstanding ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable and consistent handling for daily driving
- Improved steering feel compared to many entry-level or older performance tires
Cons
- Highly inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Lack of sharp, high-performance steering feedback for aggressive driving
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a lack of stability under heavy cornering
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or 'hollow' sounds
Observations
- Users with smaller, daily-driven vehicles (e.g., C-Max, Audi A1) report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
- Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles or those expecting track-day precision often find the sidewalls too soft and the steering feedback lacking compared to dedicated performance tires.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with users praising it as a strong, high-value touring tire that often rivals more expensive premium brands like Michelin. Reviewers and owners highlight its good performance in both dry and wet conditions, though longevity estimates in professional tests show some variation. Overall, it is seen as a significant upgrade over budget or stock tires and a great choice for everyday driving.
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
Based on 13 community posts
Vredestein Ultrac
Community members generally view the Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro as a compelling, budget-friendly alternative to premium high-performance summer tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. Users frequently highlight significant cost savings alongside comparable dry and wet performance, comfort, and noise levels, though a few note trade-offs in extreme cornering stiffness.
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
“Are budget tyres closing the gap to premium? I changed a set of tyres on my daily pd130 winter bash about and managed to get a set of vredestein ultrac for £80 a tyre fitted which I thought was a pretty good price. The tyre fitting service was saying to me that the gap between budgets and premium is much smaller in the last 10 years and that taxis tend to opt for budget tyres all the time and have no issues. Any thoughts on this? I’ve always gone for medium to higher end tyres. Leer más”
“I just had a set of Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta put on. Initial thoughts... I got them in 275/40/20 for the fronts and 315/35/20 for the rears. They fit the wheels perfectly. I immediately noticed a much softer ride. Sport Mode now feels like Tour Mode, maybe even softer. I DD my ZL1 so cold weather performance is very important. Temps were near 40°F and they stayed quite grippy. This is a huge improvement over the stock Goodyear's. Initial turn in response is good. I had the opportunity to push them on an off ramp and they felt a little mushy when pushed and didn't seem to want to exceed .75g I had a set of these on a previous car (2004 ZO6) and expect great wet weather performance. I will update this post once I get some more miles on them. Read more”
“The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are probably the best sport tyres ever made. Ive sold tyres for a living since I was 16, I've tried and tested hundreds of different tyres so i can give my customers the best advice, so I class myself as somewhat of an expert. The Sessantas are brilliant. I had them on an X5 for 8,000 miles, they couldn't have performed all round any better. EDIT: Oh and they wear so evenly it's unbelievable!”
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | B · Vredestein Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook
Vredestein
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, noise and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 64 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 85 vs 78 on noise.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 83 vs 77 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.