65
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
47 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Yokohama ADVAN A048 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE040 and Yokohama ADVAN A048 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE040 is stronger on treadwear and wet. Yokohama ADVAN A048 is stronger on dry and handling.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A048 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE040 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 96 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE040 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE040 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 53 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE040 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE040 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 56 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Potenza RE040 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE040 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 51 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ADVAN A048 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Potenza RE040 | ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE040 | Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 64 |
| Dry | 79 | 96 |
| Wet | 58 | 53 |
| Comfort | 57 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 51 |
| Handling | 70 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza RE040 is a polarizing, performance-oriented tire that excels in dry, warm conditions but struggles significantly with road noise and wet-weather confidence. While many drivers appreciate the stiff sidewalls for their precise steering feedback and progressive handling, the consensus is that the tire is outdated, with modern alternatives offering superior comfort and all-weather capability.
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and handling
- High level of steering feedback and directness
- Progressive and predictable breakaway characteristics
- Stiff sidewalls provide a sporty, responsive feel
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or cold conditions
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff construction
- Inconsistent tread life depending on vehicle and driving style
Observations
- Owners of performance-oriented vehicles like the Nissan 350z and Mazda RX-8 often praise the tire's dry-weather feedback but note its limitations on track or in the rain.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive hatchbacks (e.g., Honda Civic Type R) frequently report significant understeer and rapid front-tire wear.
- Users with quieter, luxury-oriented vehicles (e.g., Audi A8, Mazda 6) report that the tire's high noise levels significantly detract from the overall driving experience.
The Yokohama Advan A048 is widely regarded as a premier semi-slick tire for lightweight sports cars, particularly the Lotus and Caterham platforms. While it offers exceptional dry-weather performance and communicative feedback, users note that it requires precise pressure and temperature management to reach its full potential.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering adhesion
- High level of steering feedback and handling precision
- Progressive breakaway characteristics
- Strong performance on lightweight track-focused vehicles
Cons
- Rapid tread wear during track sessions
- High road noise levels
- Difficult to maintain optimal operating temperatures
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning in deep standing water
Observations
- Lotus-specific variants feature unique sidewall stiffness that significantly alters handling characteristics compared to standard versions.
- Drivers of lightweight chassis report that the tire's stiff sidewalls provide excellent braking performance, often preventing ABS intervention.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040 | B · Yokohama ADVAN A048 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Bridgestone
64
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE040 and Yokohama ADVAN A048 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE040 is stronger on treadwear and wet. Yokohama ADVAN A048 is stronger on dry and handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 96 vs 79 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 scores 65 vs 51 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN A048 scores 81 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 scores 58 vs 53 on wet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A048
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN A048 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.