Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Bridgestone

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
90/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
90/100
450 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
88
Comfort
75
Noise
70
Treadwear
71
Handling
97

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan A050

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Yokohama Advan A050 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
97
Wet
48
Comfort
64
Noise
–
Treadwear
35
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A050 leads by 4
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
93
B — Yokohama Advan A050
97
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE 71RSAdvan A050
Professional tests (TWG score) 92 –
Tire Rack owners 95 –
Tyre Reviews owners 95 97
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Potenza RE 71RS leads by 40
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
88
B — Yokohama Advan A050
48
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE 71RSAdvan A050
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 70 –
Tyre Reviews owners 75 48
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Potenza RE 71RS leads by 11
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
75
B — Yokohama Advan A050
64
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE 71RSAdvan A050
Tire Rack owners 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners 61 64
SimpleTire owners 70 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
70
B — Yokohama Advan A050
–
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE 71RSAdvan A050
SimpleTire owners 70 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Potenza RE 71RS leads by 36
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
71
B — Yokohama Advan A050
35
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE 71RSAdvan A050
Tire Rack owners 71 –
Tyre Reviews owners 67 35
SimpleTire owners 70 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Potenza RE 71RS leads by 5
A — Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
97
B — Yokohama Advan A050
92
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE 71RSAdvan A050
Tyre Reviews owners 97 92

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE 71RSYokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 84 61
Dry 93 97
Wet 88 48
Comfort 75 64
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 71 35
Handling 97 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

The Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is widely regarded as a benchmark in the 'super 200tw' category, offering exceptional dry grip, sharp steering response, and predictable handling for autocross and track enthusiasts. While it is street-legal and surprisingly refined in terms of noise and comfort for its class, it is primarily a performance-focused tire that prioritizes lap times over longevity.

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
  • Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
  • Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.
  • Strong performance in wet conditions for a high-performance summer tire.
  • Consistent performance across a wide range of ambient temperatures.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
  • Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
  • Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
  • High susceptibility to picking up road debris and gravel.
  • Performance drop-off in standing water or heavy rain despite decent wet-weather capability.

Observations

  • Lightweight vehicles like the Mazda Miata benefit significantly from the tire's quick warm-up and predictable handling.
  • Heavier vehicles or those with high horsepower may experience accelerated tread wear and heat-soak issues during long track sessions.
  • Users noted that proper tire pressure management is critical, with many finding that lower cold pressures are necessary to prevent the tire from becoming greasy.
Tire B Yokohama Advan A050

The Yokohama Advan A050 is widely regarded as a premier R-spec semi-slick tire, offering class-leading dry grip and exceptional handling feedback for time attack and track-focused enthusiasts. While users praise its consistent performance and predictable nature, they acknowledge that its high cost and rapid tread wear necessitate a dedicated use case, as it is not optimized for wet conditions or daily commuting.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
  • Rapid warm-up time providing confidence from cold

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
  • Compound-dependent performance variability

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on suspension tuning, as the extreme grip levels can overwhelm poorly set-up vehicles.
  • Front-wheel drive users reported significantly faster wear on front tires compared to the rear, with an estimated lifespan of 5,000 km to 7,000 km.
Community buzz

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Positive

The community regards the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS as an exceptionally sticky and high-performing extreme performance tire, often sought after for track use and spirited driving. Users frequently discuss clearance sales, sizing and fitment nuances (noting they tend to run wide), and their limited tread life given their 200-treadwear rating. Overall, users are very enthusiastic about their grip and handling capabilities.

r/ElantraN ·5 upvotes ·2025-09-06

“Track tire fitment Just got some new Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs in 245/40r18. I did my research on this subreddit and it seems like that will fit without rubbing/camber bolts. Does anyone know if the RE-71rs’ run wide cause they measure a full inch wider than the stock PS4s’, I’m just wondering now if I’ll need camber bolts. I’d prefer not, just want to throw them on and go. For reference they are being mounted onto a 18x8.5 +45 Enkei TS-V wheel. If anyone could offer insight cause I just can’t understand how they would fit but maybe I’m just over thinking it. Stock suspension by the way. I searched the sub and didn’t see anything with exact matching specs, only bigger and different tires. Tl;dr Will 245/40r18 Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs’ fit on an 18x8.5 +45 wheel without clearance issues/adding other modifications (camber bolts) on our car? Thanks for any help! Read more”

r/CarTrackDays ·2 upvotes ·2025-02-17

“Need heat cycle advice I recently got a screaming deal on some Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS for my daily driver. It usually doesn't see track time but I figured it would be fun to try it out for the cost. The tires were cheap because they had a 2021 production date. In the past to heat cycle a tire, I've just driven on the highway a couple of hours and let the tire sit for 24 hours. The hurdle is, It's winter and too cold to really make an impact. To add to that, I doubt I will have clean enough roads for that tire. My track does have winter lapping when it is clean and dry, but it still may be cold. Any suggestions on how to get a heat cycle on these tires in cold temperatures? Read more”

r/MechanicAdvice ·1 upvote ·2021-08-02

“Mileage-expectancy of Bridgestone Potenza RE-71Rs? (200-rated, I think?) Forgive me I'm getting the terminology wrong, but I just bought a super dynamite NA Miata that has had a TON of incredible suspension work (mostly Flyin' Miata stuff) and the stickiest tires I have ever experienced by FAR: Potenza RE-71Rs. (Forget full measurements but they're on 15 x 7.5" inch wheels, 6UL's by 949 Racing.) And I think their life is pretty much over. I love them but I don't want to track the car; I want to drive it two hours into the country every other weekend. I want to drive through the mountains with great . . . spiritedness . . . but I don't need track-focused tires. I'd much rather have something slightly less grippy in exchange for longer tread life. The previous owner (who I've stayed in touch with) recommenced I get "300-rated" tires instead of "200-rated" tires. I don't really know what that means or how many miles I can expect from such a tire. I'm contemplating getting the Continental Extreme Contacts, but I just don't know enough about tires to know what they're like or how much ACTUAL mileage I can get----I also dont' understand 200 vs. 300 tires. Please help?”

Top themes
#exceptional grip performance#track and autocross use#tire sizing and fitment#treadwear and mileage#closeout and clearance sales#cold and wet limitations

Based on 8 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Advan A050

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS B · Yokohama Advan A050
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth7/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 88 vs 48 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 71 vs 35 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 75 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 97 vs 92 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.