Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Ventus R-S4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
72
Comfort
61
Treadwear
86
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan A050

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Yokohama Advan A050 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
6 owner reviews
Dry
97
Wet
48
Comfort
64
Treadwear
35
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if dry, handling and comfort matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A050 leads by 10
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
87
B — Yokohama Advan A050
97
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 87 97

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 24
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
72
B — Yokohama Advan A050
48
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 71 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 48

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A050 leads by 3
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
61
B — Yokohama Advan A050
64
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners 61 64

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 51
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
86
B — Yokohama Advan A050
35
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan A050
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 35

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan A050 leads by 4
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
88
B — Yokohama Advan A050
92
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan A050
Tyre Reviews owners 88 92

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Yokohama Advan A050: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus R-S4Yokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 79 61
Dry 87 97
Wet 72 48
Comfort 61 64
Treadwear 86 35
Handling 88 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus R-S4

The Hankook Ventus RS4 is widely regarded as the industry benchmark for endurance-focused extreme performance summer tires. While it may not offer the absolute peak grip of specialized autocross tires, it is highly praised for its exceptional tread life, heat consistency, and value, making it a favorite for HPDE participants and endurance racers.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability under heavy track abuse
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to more expensive competitors
  • Consistent dry grip and performance throughout the tire's lifespan
  • Predictable handling and excellent steering feedback
  • Strong heat resistance during long track sessions

Cons

  • Requires significant time and effort to reach optimal operating temperatures
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality compared to standard tires
  • Reduced traction in cold or wet conditions
  • Potential fitment issues due to narrow section width relative to nominal size

Observations

  • Lightweight FWD vehicles report excellent handling characteristics and high confidence with this tire.
  • Users note that the tire's sidewall width runs narrow, which may leave rims exposed if sized based on standard tire width expectations.
Tire B Yokohama Advan A050

The Yokohama Advan A050 is widely regarded as a premier R-spec semi-slick tire, offering class-leading dry grip and exceptional handling feedback for time attack and track-focused enthusiasts. While users praise its consistent performance and predictable nature, they acknowledge that its high cost and rapid tread wear necessitate a dedicated use case, as it is not optimized for wet conditions or daily commuting.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life
  • Rapid warm-up time providing confidence from cold

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
  • Compound-dependent performance variability

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's performance is highly dependent on suspension tuning, as the extreme grip levels can overwhelm poorly set-up vehicles.
  • Front-wheel drive users reported significantly faster wear on front tires compared to the rear, with an estimated lifespan of 5,000 km to 7,000 km.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 B · Yokohama Advan A050
Category—Summer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Yokohama Advan A050 if dry, handling and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 86 vs 35 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 72 vs 48 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 97 vs 87 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan A050 scores 92 vs 88 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus R-S4
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.