Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN A11A vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AYokohama

ADVAN A11A

Summer High Performance tires

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 2 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    81
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A11APilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)–81
    Reviews found online–81
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A11APilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)–48
    Reviews found online–50
  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A11APilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Reviews found online–76
  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A11APilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Reviews found online–63
  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A11APilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Reviews found online–67
  6. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN A11APilot Sport Cup 2 R
    Reviews found online–80
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN A11A vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN A11AMichelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Relative Score – 68
Dry – 81
Wet – 49
Comfort – 73
Noise – 65
Treadwear – 67
Handling – 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN A11A

Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN A11A

Pros

  • Confident dry-weather cornering and handling
  • Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
  • High durability and long tread life

Cons

  • Concerns regarding structural integrity, specifically sidewall splitting over time
  • Mediocre performance and braking confidence on wet surfaces
  • Firm ride quality that may be uncomfortable for some drivers
All owner themes in the ADVAN A11A review

Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Pros

  • Tremendous dry grip and track performance
  • Provides an extremely planted and confident feel
  • Superior evolution of the standard Cup 2 for track enthusiasts

Cons

  • Very limited wet weather capability requiring extreme caution in damp conditions
  • Extremely shallow and narrow tread pattern poor for water dissipation
  • Short lifespan, best reserved for single-lap timed tests or dedicated circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport Cup 2 R review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN A11A B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
CategorySummer High Performance tiresSummer Trackday and Competition tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN A11A

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

Only Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN A11A
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.