Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Yokohama ADVAN A11A — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Goodyear

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

Summer Max Performance tires

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
94/100
20 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
250 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
90
Snow
52
Comfort
82
Noise
72
Treadwear
79
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama ADVAN A11A

Summer High Performance tires

Yokohama ADVAN A11A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
75
Snow
–
Comfort
75
Noise
–
Treadwear
95
Handling
95

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Yokohama ADVAN A11A are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is stronger on wet and comfort. Yokohama ADVAN A11A is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A11A leads by 2
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
90
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ADVAN A11A
Professional tests (TWG score) 85 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 15
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
75
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ADVAN A11A
Professional tests (TWG score) 89 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 75

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
52
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 leads by 7
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
82
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
75
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ADVAN A11A
Professional tests (TWG score) 84 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 75

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
–
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ADVAN A11A
Professional tests (TWG score) 72 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ADVAN A11A leads by 16
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
95
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ADVAN A11A
Tyre Reviews owners 79 95

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ADVAN A11A leads by 7
A — Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88
B — Yokohama ADVAN A11A
95
Why this score
SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 5ADVAN A11A
Tyre Reviews owners 88 95
DriverReviews owners 88 –

Scores at a glance

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Yokohama ADVAN A11A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5Yokohama ADVAN A11A
Relative Score 85 86
Dry 88 90
Wet 90 75
Snow 52 –
Comfort 82 75
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 79 95
Handling 88 95

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier, high-performance all-rounder that excels in both wet and dry conditions. Users frequently praise its predictable handling, strong grip, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While most owners report high satisfaction, some note concerns regarding road noise and inconsistent tread life depending on driving style and vehicle weight.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip
  • Predictable and confidence-inspiring handling at the limit
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Strong braking performance
  • Good rim protection features

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise on certain surfaces
  • Tread life can be inconsistent, with some users reporting rapid wear
  • Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride on rough roads
  • Occasional reports of quality control issues like balancing difficulties

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 5 consistently report a massive improvement in ride comfort and steering feel.
  • Drivers of heavier or high-torque vehicles (e.g., 300hp+ sedans) report faster tread wear, though many still praise the tire's ability to manage power delivery.
  • Some users on lower-profile setups (18-20 inch) noted increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections compared to smaller, higher-profile configurations.
Tire B Yokohama ADVAN A11A

The Yokohama Advan A11A is generally regarded as a capable, performance-oriented tire that offers predictable handling and strong dry-weather grip. While users appreciate its longevity and rigid sidewall feedback, there are notable concerns regarding long-term structural integrity and wet-weather braking performance.

Pros

  • Confident dry-weather cornering and handling
  • Excellent braking performance in dry conditions
  • High durability and long tread life
  • Good road feedback and rigid sidewall construction

Cons

  • Concerns regarding structural integrity, specifically sidewall splitting over time
  • Mediocre performance and braking confidence on wet surfaces
  • Firm ride quality that may be uncomfortable for some drivers

Observations

  • The tire is noted for maintaining consistent performance characteristics over high mileage, with one user reporting successful use over 70,000 km.
  • The tire's rigid sidewalls are specifically praised for providing clear road feedback, which some drivers find beneficial for spirited rear-wheel-drive applications.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 B · Yokohama ADVAN A11A
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available16—
Rim diameters18″ – 21″—
Tread depth7 - 9/32″—
UTQG300 - 500 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear

Yokohama

Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Yokohama ADVAN A11A are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is stronger on wet and comfort. Yokohama ADVAN A11A is stronger on treadwear and handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN A11A scores 95 vs 79 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 90 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 75 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN A11A scores 95 vs 88 on handling.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A11A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.