90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
84/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
94/100
1,988 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
79 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 87 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 45 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 65 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 R leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 78 |
| Dry | 94 | 91 |
| Wet | 83 | 72 |
| Comfort | 94 | 76 |
| Noise | 92 | – |
| Treadwear | 90 | 75 |
| Handling | 96 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
90
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R is a specialized, track-focused tire that offers exceptional dry-weather grip and steering precision for high-performance vehicles. While it excels in competitive driving and track-day environments, users emphasize that it is not suitable for daily driving, particularly due to its rapid tread wear, poor wet-weather performance, and lack of cold-temperature capability.
Pros
- Unrivaled dry-weather traction and cornering grip
- Precise steering response and communicative feedback
- Excellent performance consistency during track sessions
- Superior stability at high speeds
Cons
- Extremely short tread life and rapid wear
- Significant safety risks in wet or cold conditions
- High purchase price and high cost-per-mile
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality
Observations
- Performance is highly dependent on vehicle-specific alignment settings; improper camber can lead to premature shoulder wear.
- Users note that the tire requires significant heat to reach optimal operating temperatures, making it feel 'sketchy' or stiff during short street trips.
- The tire is frequently cited as a 'one-trick pony' for track-day enthusiasts, with many users recommending the Pilot Sport 4S as a more practical alternative for street-driven vehicles.
The Yokohama Advan Neova AD07 is widely regarded as a high-performance, track-oriented tire that excels in dry grip, steering feedback, and predictability. While it is highly praised for its communicative nature and progressive breakaway characteristics, users note that it is an 'endurance' style 200TW tire rather than a 'super 200' compound, meaning it prioritizes longevity and consistency over absolute peak lap times.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and steering precision
- Highly predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
- Excellent durability and tread life for a track-capable tire
- Strong communication and feedback near the limit
Cons
- Can become 'greasy' or lose grip during extended, high-heat track sessions
- Higher road noise compared to standard summer tires
- Performance in wet conditions is adequate but requires caution
- Premium price point compared to some competitors
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars, such as the Lotus Elise, report that the tire significantly improves handling stability and reduces twitchiness compared to OE-spec alternatives.
- High-horsepower vehicles (500+ whp) generally find the tire effective for street traction, though some users note that it may not match the ultimate grip of dedicated 'super 200' tires on track.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R | B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | Summer Extreme Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
90
/ 100
Michelin
78
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R — better comfort, treadwear and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 94 vs 76 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 90 vs 75 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 96 vs 82 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R scores 83 vs 72 on wet.
Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R also compared with
Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.