Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Yokohama A-008P vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Yokohama

Yokohama A-008P

Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
96/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
100
Wet
90
Comfort
100
Treadwear
80
Handling
100
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
100 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
71
Comfort
77
Treadwear
74
Handling
90
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama A-008P — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A-008P leads by 7
A
100
B
93
Why this score
SourceA-008PAdvan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 100 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A-008P leads by 19
A
90
B
71
Why this score
SourceA-008PAdvan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 90 72

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A-008P leads by 23
A
100
B
77
Why this score
SourceA-008PAdvan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 100 74

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) A-008P leads by 6
A
80
B
74
Why this score
SourceA-008PAdvan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 80 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) A-008P leads by 10
A
100
B
90
Why this score
SourceA-008PAdvan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 100 90

Scores at a glance

CategoryYokohama A-008PYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 92 79
Dry 100 93
Wet 90 71
Comfort 100 77
Treadwear 80 74
Handling 100 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Yokohama A-008P

The Yokohama A008P is highly regarded by enthusiasts for its exceptional handling characteristics and historical significance as an OEM-validated tire for Porsche. While performance feedback is overwhelmingly positive, some users have reported significant quality control issues regarding tire uniformity and balancing.

Pros

  • Spectacular handling and cornering performance
  • High level of driver confidence and road feedback
  • Authentic period-correct choice for classic Porsche vehicles

Cons

  • Difficulties with tire balancing
  • Potential for manufacturing defects leading to out-of-round tires
  • Limited availability and difficulty in sourcing replacements

Observations

  • Highly praised for performance on classic vehicles like the Renault 21 2L TXI and Porsche 911.
  • Users emphasize that the tire's performance capabilities often exceed the limits of the vehicles they are fitted to.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

The Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 (and its successor, the AD09) is widely regarded as a premier dual-purpose tire that excels in dry-weather performance and steering feedback. While it offers impressive grip and predictability for track days and spirited canyon driving, users note that it requires proper heat management and can become greasy if overdriven or pushed beyond its thermal limits.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
  • Sharp, communicative steering response and feedback
  • Stiff sidewall construction providing excellent turn-in precision
  • Surprisingly good wet-weather performance for a 200TW tire
  • Better tread life and durability compared to many dedicated track-focused tires

Cons

  • Can become 'greasy' or lose grip when overheated during extended track sessions
  • Increased road noise compared to standard summer tires
  • Susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water
  • Potential for tread chunking if driven aggressively on highly abrasive track surfaces

Observations

  • Lightweight sports cars (e.g., Lotus Elise, Mazda MX-5) report high satisfaction with the tire's responsiveness and feedback.
  • High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., 500+ whp M340i, 700whp builds) note that the tire provides excellent traction for street use, though some users with 400+ hp suggest even stickier compounds for pure drag-strip performance.
  • Users on 20-inch wheels occasionally report issues with tire uniformity or balancing, though this is less common on smaller diameter setups.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama A-008P B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Category—Summer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama A-008P — better comfort, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A-008P scores 100 vs 77 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama A-008P scores 90 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama A-008P scores 100 vs 90 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama A-008P scores 100 vs 93 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama A-008P
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.