Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 5
A
72
B
77
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 71 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 12
A
55
B
67
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 54 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
60
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 45
A
35
B
80
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 32 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
76
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 16
A
55
B
71
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 55 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 25
A
48
B
73
Why this score
SourcePotenza RE050A Run FlatAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 48 73

Scores at a glance

CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE050A Run FlatYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 53 73
Dry 72 77
Wet 55 67
Snow – 60
Comfort 35 80
Noise – 76
Treadwear 55 71
Handling 48 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat

The Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat is a polarizing performance tire that is frequently criticized for its harsh ride quality, excessive road noise, and tendency to tramline on uneven surfaces. While many users praise its dry-weather grip and steering precision, the consensus is heavily skewed toward dissatisfaction due to poor wet-weather performance, rapid or uneven tread wear, and a high susceptibility to sidewall damage and rim cracking on poor road surfaces.

Pros

  • Strong dry-weather grip and cornering stability
  • Responsive steering feedback and precise turn-in
  • Good longevity for some users when driven primarily on highways
  • Reliable run-flat capability in emergency situations

Cons

  • Extremely harsh and uncomfortable ride quality
  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Significant road noise and vibration
  • High susceptibility to tramlining and tracking issues
  • Frequent reports of sidewall bulges, blowouts, and cracked alloy wheels

Observations

  • Users with 18-inch and 19-inch low-profile setups report the most severe ride harshness and frequent rim damage.
  • BMW M-Sport owners frequently report that the combination of stiff suspension and these run-flat tires creates an unacceptably jarring driving experience.
  • EV owners noted that the tire's high rolling resistance significantly negatively impacts vehicle efficiency compared to other performance tires.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummer Max Performance tires—
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 35 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 71 vs 55 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 67 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.