Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat — better snow, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat leads by 6
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
83
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 83 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat leads by 7
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
74
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 73 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat leads by 27
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
87
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 22
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
58
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 57 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
–
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat leads by 1
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
72
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 71 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat leads by 1
A — Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
74
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourceSport Contact 3 SSR Run flatAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 74 73

Scores at a glance

Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flatYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 74 71
Dry 83 77
Wet 74 67
Snow 87 60
Comfort 58 80
Noise – 76
Treadwear 72 71
Handling 74 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat

The Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR is a polarizing run-flat tire that excels in dry handling and steering precision but suffers from significant compromises in ride comfort and wet-weather performance. While many drivers appreciate its sharp turn-in and agility on smooth surfaces, the stiff sidewalls are frequently criticized for creating a harsh, noisy, and jarring experience on uneven or potholed roads.

Pros

  • Sharp, responsive steering and agile handling
  • Excellent dry-weather grip and road feedback
  • Progressive behavior at the limit
  • Improved performance compared to some OE run-flat alternatives

Cons

  • Extremely harsh and uncomfortable ride quality
  • High levels of road noise
  • Poor or inconsistent wet-weather traction
  • Susceptibility to tramlining and tracking issues

Observations

  • Users with smaller, sport-oriented vehicles like the Mini Cooper report that the tire's stiffness can negatively impact suspension compliance and steering stability on rough surfaces.
  • Drivers of heavier executive sedans (e.g., BMW 5 Series) frequently report that the tire's rigidity exacerbates road imperfections, leading to increased cabin rattles and potential suspension component wear.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummer Max Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Winner: Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat — better snow, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat scores 87 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat scores 74 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat scores 83 vs 77 on dry.

Tire A · Continental Sport Contact 3 SSR Run flat
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.