Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Falken

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S

Premium Touring All Season tire

Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
15 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
72
Snow
70
Comfort
78
Noise
95
Treadwear
53
Handling
63

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S and Yokohama Advan Sport AS are within 2 points overall. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S is stronger on noise, snow and dry. Yokohama Advan Sport AS is stronger on treadwear and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZIEX ZE001 A/S leads by 8
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
85
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tire Rack owners 74 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 80
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ZIEX ZE001 A/S leads by 5
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
72
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tire Rack owners 63 –
Tyre Reviews owners 68 73
SimpleTire owners 85 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZIEX ZE001 A/S leads by 10
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
70
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Tire Rack owners 43 –
Tyre Reviews owners 62 60
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 2
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
78
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tire Rack owners 70 –
Tyre Reviews owners 70 90
SimpleTire owners 100 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ZIEX ZE001 A/S leads by 19
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
95
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 18
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
53
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Tire Rack owners 50 –
Tyre Reviews owners 47 80
SimpleTire owners 70 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 10
A — Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
63
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 63 73

Scores at a glance

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE001 A/SYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 85 77
Wet 72 67
Snow 70 60
Comfort 78 80
Noise 95 76
Treadwear 53 71
Handling 63 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S

The Falken Ziex ZE001 AS is generally regarded as a competent OEM-spec tire that offers a comfortable, quiet ride and reliable dry-road handling. However, user consensus is heavily polarized by significant concerns regarding premature tread wear and subpar performance in winter conditions, particularly snow and slush.

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable dry-road traction and handling
  • Satisfactory performance for daily commuting and highway driving
  • Good initial feedback and wet-road grip for moderate driving

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and confidence in snow and icy conditions
  • Low hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
  • High replacement cost relative to longevity

Observations

  • Subaru owners frequently report that the tire fails to meet expected mileage intervals, often requiring replacement well before 40,000 miles.
  • Drivers of higher-output vehicles, such as the Mazda 6 Turbo, report that the tire struggles to manage torque, leading to significant wet-weather traction issues.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tire—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available61
Rim diameters17″ – 20″17″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG360 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken

Yokohama

Too close to call: Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S and Yokohama Advan Sport AS are within 2 points overall. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S is stronger on noise, snow and dry. Yokohama Advan Sport AS is stronger on treadwear and handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S scores 95 vs 76 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 71 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S scores 70 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.