Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25

All Season High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
65/100
8 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
66
Snow
–
Comfort
49
Noise
–
Treadwear
71
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ecsta AST KU25 leads by 6
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
83
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 83 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 1
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
66
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 66 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
–
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 31
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
49
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 49 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
–
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
71
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 71 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 8
A — Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
65
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourceEcsta AST KU25Advan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 65 73

Scores at a glance

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Ecsta AST KU25Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 67 73
Dry 83 77
Wet 66 67
Snow – 60
Comfort 49 80
Noise – 76
Treadwear 71 71
Handling 65 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Ecsta AST KU25

The Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 is generally regarded as an affordable, entry-level tire suitable for daily commuting rather than performance-oriented driving. While users appreciate its dry-weather grip and aesthetic tread pattern, the tire is frequently criticized for significant road noise and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.

Pros

  • Attractive and aggressive tread design
  • Strong dry-weather traction and handling
  • High value-to-price ratio
  • Satisfactory tread longevity for daily driving

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Unpredictable and poor wet-weather performance
  • Abrupt loss of grip when pushed to limits
  • Not suitable for spirited or performance driving

Observations

  • Users noted that the tire's stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback, which some drivers appreciate for daily handling.
  • Performance characteristics are highly polarized, with some users reporting confidence in heavy rain while others report dangerous instability.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategoryAll Season High Performance tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 49 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 scores 83 vs 77 on dry.

Tire A · Kumho Ecsta AST KU25
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.