Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 80 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 73 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 60 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 49 | 90 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 80 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta AST KU25 | Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 73 |
| Dry | 83 | 77 |
| Wet | 66 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 49 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 71 |
| Handling | 65 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 is generally regarded as an affordable, entry-level tire suitable for daily commuting rather than performance-oriented driving. While users appreciate its dry-weather grip and aesthetic tread pattern, the tire is frequently criticized for significant road noise and inconsistent performance in wet conditions.
Pros
- Attractive and aggressive tread design
- Strong dry-weather traction and handling
- High value-to-price ratio
- Satisfactory tread longevity for daily driving
Cons
- Excessive and intrusive road noise
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather performance
- Abrupt loss of grip when pushed to limits
- Not suitable for spirited or performance driving
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's stiff sidewall provides good steering feedback, which some drivers appreciate for daily handling.
- Performance characteristics are highly polarized, with some users reporting confidence in heavy rain while others report dangerous instability.
The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
- Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
- Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
- Potential for stability issues at highway speeds
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
- One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
- Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama Advan Sport AS — better comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 if dry matters most to you.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 49 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 65 on handling.
Kumho Ecsta AST KU25 scores 83 vs 77 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.