Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Michelin Pilot Primacy vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Michelin

Michelin Pilot Primacy

Summer Premium Touring tires

Michelin Pilot Primacy tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
52 owner reviews
Dry
80
Wet
76
Snow
–
Comfort
71
Noise
–
Treadwear
85
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama Advan Sport AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
67/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
67
Snow
60
Comfort
80
Noise
76
Treadwear
71
Handling
73

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Primacy — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Pilot Primacy leads by 3
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
80
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
77
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 70
Tyre Reviews owners 80 80

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Primacy leads by 9
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
76
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
67
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 58
Tyre Reviews owners 76 73

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
–
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
60
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners – 60

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 9
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
71
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
80
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 71 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
–
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
76
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Professional tests (TWG score) – 76

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Pilot Primacy leads by 14
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
85
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
71
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 85 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport AS leads by 5
A — Michelin Pilot Primacy
68
B — Yokohama Advan Sport AS
73
Why this score
SourcePilot PrimacyAdvan Sport AS
Tyre Reviews owners 68 73

Scores at a glance

Michelin Pilot Primacy vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot PrimacyYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 77 73
Dry 80 77
Wet 76 67
Snow – 60
Comfort 71 80
Noise – 76
Treadwear 85 71
Handling 68 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Michelin Pilot Primacy

The Michelin Pilot Primacy is widely regarded as a high-longevity touring tire that excels in daily driving conditions but often falls short for enthusiasts seeking sporty handling. While many users praise its exceptional tread life and consistent wet-weather safety, a significant portion of the user base reports issues with excessive road noise and a lack of steering feedback.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Consistent and reliable wet-weather grip
  • High levels of comfort for daily commuting
  • Predictable and safe handling characteristics

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Expensive price point compared to competitors
  • Lack of steering precision and sporty feedback
  • Tendency for rubber to harden and crack over long periods

Observations

  • Users with diesel-powered vehicles often noted that higher tire pressures were required to prevent uneven shoulder wear.
  • Drivers of performance-oriented vehicles frequently reported that the soft sidewalls resulted in poor cornering feedback and premature shoulder wear during spirited driving.
  • Owners of heavier sedans and people carriers reported the best balance of comfort and longevity, often achieving high mileage figures.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport AS

The Yokohama Advan Sport AS is generally regarded as a competent, budget-friendly performance tire that excels in comfort and dry-road handling. While many users appreciate the value proposition and smooth ride quality, there is a notable divide regarding tread longevity and wet-weather performance, with some users reporting premature wear and stability concerns.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price, especially when sourced as discounted inventory
  • Smooth and quiet ride quality
  • Strong dry-road grip and cornering performance
  • Improved acceleration times compared to previous sets

Cons

  • Significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Inconsistent performance in wet or cool conditions
  • Lack of high-end performance feedback for spirited driving
  • Potential for stability issues at highway speeds

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to this standard construction report improved ride comfort.
  • One user noted superior tread longevity on an electric vehicle compared to their previous Pirelli tires.
  • Performance-oriented drivers found the tire insufficient for track-day longevity, noting rapid degradation after limited use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Primacy B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategorySummer Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—440 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin

Yokohama

Winner: Michelin Pilot Primacy — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if comfort and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Primacy scores 85 vs 71 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Primacy scores 76 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 80 vs 71 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 68 on handling.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Primacy
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.