Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 vs Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 68 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 95% | 97% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 88% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 56 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 69 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 | ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 83 |
| DriverReviews owners | 84 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 77 |
| Dry | 79 | 77 |
| Wet | 88 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 80 |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 77 |
| Handling | 67 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #6/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | -2.4 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 81% #10/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 85% #10/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | -3.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 8% #13/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test | +12.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 94% #4/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +5.6 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/12 · 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tyre Test | 88% #8/10 · 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test | +11.8 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T001 receives a polarized reception from users, often serving as a divisive factory-fitted tire. While many drivers appreciate its dry-weather handling, steering feedback, and comfort, a significant portion of the user base reports concerns regarding inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Solid dry-weather grip and handling
- Responsive steering feedback
- Generally comfortable ride quality
- Good value for money at certain price points
Cons
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction and aquaplaning resistance
- Rapid and uneven tread wear reported by many users
- High road noise levels on certain surfaces
- Susceptibility to punctures and sidewall softness
Observations
- Users with FWD vehicles frequently report understeer and rapid front-tire wear compared to rear-axle longevity.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-performance driving styles noted significantly lower mileage expectations than the tire's touring classification suggests.
- Some users on 17-inch and larger wheels noted that the tire's sidewall stiffness can lead to a harsh ride on imperfect road surfaces.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V105 is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry handling, steering responsiveness, and wet-weather confidence. While many users praise its balanced nature and value compared to premium rivals, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and noise levels, particularly as the tires age.
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and cornering stability
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of steering feedback and turn-in precision
- Competitive pricing compared to other flagship performance brands
- Predictable handling characteristics at the limit
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially under spirited driving
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Performance drop-off in freezing temperatures and snow
- Occasional 'flat-spotting' or vibration after the vehicle has been stationary for extended periods
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent handling balance and longevity, often citing the tire as an ideal OE-style replacement.
- Drivers of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive sedans (e.g., BMW 5-series, Audi S4) note that while grip is impressive, rear tire wear is significantly accelerated compared to front tires.
- Some users with larger luxury sedans noted that the tire's 'firm' construction can lead to a harsher ride over small road imperfections.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better handling and treadwear. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza T001 if wet and comfort matter most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 83 vs 67 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 77 vs 63 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 88 vs 81 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.