61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Solus KH25 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better treadwear, snow and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus KH25 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 69 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 55 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 54
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 31 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 54 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 61
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 48 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Solus KH25 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Solus KH25 | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Solus KH25 | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 89 |
| Dry | 80 | 95 |
| Wet | 72 | 93 |
| Snow | 31 | 85 |
| Comfort | 78 | 89 |
| Noise | – | 88 |
| Treadwear | 29 | 90 |
| Handling | 90 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Solus KH25 is generally regarded as a competent factory-equipped tire that offers a smooth ride and reliable dry handling. While users appreciate its versatility as an M+S rated tire, concerns regarding long-term structural durability and sidewall integrity prevent it from being a top-tier recommendation.
Pros
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry weather handling performance
- M+S (Mud and Snow) rating provides seasonal versatility
- Good value as an original equipment option
Cons
- Concerns regarding sidewall durability and construction quality
- Limited tread life expectancy
- Wet weather grip is described as merely adequate
Observations
- Commonly found as original equipment on compact vehicles like the Kia Rio5.
- Users note that the tire's performance characteristics are better suited for daily commuting rather than high-performance driving.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Solus KH25 | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
Kumho
89
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better treadwear, snow and wet. Pick the Kumho Solus KH25 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 29 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 85 vs 31 on snow.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 95 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Solus KH25
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Solus KH25 also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.