89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama AVID ENVigor — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
73/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better treadwear, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 68 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 8
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | AVID Ascend | AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 70 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 75 |
| Dry | 95 | 84 |
| Wet | 93 | 81 |
| Snow | 85 | 66 |
| Comfort | 89 | 73 |
| Noise | 88 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 69 |
| Handling | 80 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
The Yokohama AVID ENVigor is generally regarded as a capable grand touring tire that excels in wet and dry handling, offering drivers a sense of security and responsiveness. While users appreciate its performance characteristics and lateral grip, some report concerns regarding road noise levels and ride stiffness compared to other premium alternatives.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry road grip
- Excellent lateral stability and handling feel
- Reliable performance at highway speeds
- Good value as a grand touring option
Cons
- Higher road noise levels than some competitors
- Ride quality can feel firm or harsh on certain vehicles
- Mixed feedback regarding long-term tread life expectations
Observations
- Drivers of sport-oriented sedans like the Civic Si noted the tire provides excellent handling but can feel stiff during spirited driving.
- Users replacing OEM tires on mid-size sedans like the Mazda6 reported significant improvements in lateral feel and wet weather confidence.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Yokohama
75
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better treadwear, snow and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 90 vs 69 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 85 vs 66 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 89 vs 73 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 93 vs 81 on wet.
Tire A · Yokohama AVID Ascend
Tire B · Yokohama AVID ENVigor
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
Yokohama AVID ENVigor also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.